Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rhapso
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
151.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
I'm not afraid of dying, I'm honestly planning on intentional death if specific conditions are met, (dementia or "locked in"). I have DNR on my medical necklace next to my conditions because if they bother to slow down e
152.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
edit: the assorted "you are misinterpreting them they just mean hello" responses are fundamentally missing the point of this comment. This is an implicit part of the "positivity culture" being discussed here. We have an
153.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
The system isn't operating at maximum profit margin until the cost of components breaking outweigh the gains of overstressing them.
154.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Yeah, sadly this paper is a reasonable example of the status quo. There is a contribution in there under all the cruft (if we assume a trusted leader, and we can authenticate message origin, we don't have to use Public/private key
155.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
No. The proofs for the security security of most of the methods of public/private key systems are weaker than "you can't reverse this hash function". They are still robust in the face of computers that may physically exi
156.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Right but "Avoiding PKI" and "Secure Against Quantum Computers" barely even correlate. We have methods we consider post-quantum in heavy use. "PKI is generally sketchy and we would like to explore alternatives"
157.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
So the protocol seems to boil down to: 1) Already have a leader "Dealer" 2) The leader builds a K-of-N set of shared secret keys. 3) They publish a mapping of each participant (participant_i->hash(secret_i)) 4) The leader trans
158.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
> Pretty sure those non-cooperative strategies quickly burn themselves to extinction though. > Pretty sure those non-cooperative strategies quickly burn themselves to extinction though. Um, most life hanging out in the same tropic lev
159.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Basically, the root disagreement was "monotonic improvement". Evolution is awesome, but it couldn't work with only monotonic improvement. I used to do an "optimization" on my genetic algorithms. I'd ensure the
160.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
I decided i would prefer to quote Ms Frizzle instead of this.
161.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
You can always make it with blood instead.
162.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
I think cooperation is never a locally optimal strategy. Somebody allways gets to pick second at the prisoner's dilemma table, and locally optimal behavior is to eat the trusting idiot. Takes a lot of luck to evolve cooperation multipl
163.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
This is related, and it is the paper that lives constantly rent free in my head. I think it will retroactively be viewed as revolutionary: https://www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.p... Basically, inte
164.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372954/
165.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
<gif="blinks in Cambrian Explosion"/>
166.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Evolution is a satisficer not optimizer. All major trophic level breakthroughs are powered by evolving a reserve of efficiency in which mult-step searching can occur. multicellular life, collaboration between species, mutualism, social beha
167.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
To boil it down simple: People are vaguely good and competent, they leave systems in a locally-optimal state. In general only changes that are "one step" are considered, and they allways leave things worse when you are currently i
168.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Ah yes, because explicitly admitting who controls the financial system is more efficient than using proof of waste to measure it indirectly. I wish cryptocurrency folks would stop pretending it is about decentralization or distributed syste
169.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
No, then a company running tests is liable for damages. Being a test subject isn't a free lunch, but would definitely change my situation no matter how it played out. I've found "working from home to mitigate issues" to
170.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
The root misunderstanding is the "social species" part of my statement. Neurodiversity benefits the species, so it will be selected for as a survival trait for the species, even if it is recessive or those who express it never rep
171.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Oh agreed, but all "positive attributes" are problems at extremes. I think this is similar. Literally everything we pathologize around mental health (that isn't a direct deficit) is "normal at lower intensities"
172.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Like all variation in traits, going beyond 2 standard deviations tends to not be beneficial. We don't get to have variation without also having the potential for too much of it. Welcome to the messy stochastic search algorithm that is
173.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
https://society5.com/leadership/neurodiversity-evolution/ seems a decent summary
174.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
I'm biased to the evolutionary argument that neurodiversity is a survival trait in social animals. This theory, especially if the outcome is effectively random bias in cognitive development, would fit that.
175.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
I'm at the "sign me up, worst case im officially disabled or dead" stage of Crohn's+celiac. Not recognized as a disability by society (for aid/legal), not bad enough just to cut out the problem chunks of colon, but
176.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
"degrowth" is one of those things you don't actually need to believe in, the world will do it for us if we don't do it first. I just want to minimize the collateral damage. If folks refuse, so be it, I did my ethical dut
177.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
"degrowth" is one of those things you don't actually need to believe in, the world will do it for us if we don't do it first. I just want to minimize the collateral damage. If folks refuse, so be it, I did my ethical dut
178.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Huh, funny that my homestead site is 3 miles away from such a dam. I'd like to keep the lake at a decent level too, I like fishing. The TVA made them good! I know what I'm up to, i just really like trolling goldbugs.
179.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
So stockpile actually medium term useful things and take everybody's gold and then be a gold kingpin in the post-nuclear Renaissance?
180.
▲
by
Rhapso
2y ago
Awesome! That is a real answer rather than goldbug sales propaganda! I still don't think gold will hold value very well outside of the context of our current prosperity though.
More ›