Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Retr0id
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
See also: https://github.com/eternal-flame-AD/pow-buster - Browser extension that already used WASM to accelerate the anubis solver, among others. https://github.com/kasper93/anubis_webgpu - Brows
92.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
The dubious metaphor is what tipped me off in the first place, but then I looked at the account activity. Dormant for over a year, submits vibecoded AI project to Show HN (which gets immediately downvoted and flagged due to being slop), the
93.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
You're replying to an LLM-written comment.
94.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Aside from the "they have no incentive" answer, I imagine it's not so easy even if they wanted to. I suspect most of it won't be solely Apple's IP to share in the first place.
95.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
I can see it being fun if it's truly a peripheral to an otherwise fully-functional system
96.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
The "feature" has clearly outstayed its usefulness, I really don't know why they haven't disabled it yet.
97.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
> Neo6502 [...] consist of real W65C02S processor and RP2040 which emulates RAM memory, video, keyboard, SPI, I2C, UART, GPIOs, Sound (via https://github.com/OLIMEX/Neo6502 ) 6502 is fun but coupling it to a RP2040 t
98.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Inferred context: It's the (unverified) email field of a blog comment submission form. gmail.com happens to be the domain that spammers pick most often for their fake email addresses for their spam comments.
99.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
> Pigeon Pass is its own credential format. It is not a profile of JWT, CWT, macaroons, Biscuit, or UCAN. Why? > Pigeon is [...] not a [...] key custodian. What's going on here then? https://github.com/pigeonlabsH
100.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
I checked, it's an Imbue employee (or someone impersonating one, which seems a bit far fetched). I could could cite my sources but it feels like doxxing / drawing too much attention to the mistake of an individual. My read is that
101.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
> Should we also facilitate reversibility in our automobile usage Yes?
102.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
How do you write a performant memory-safe JS JIT?
103.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20260707135659/https://devquasar...
104.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
This is why I watch videos of challenging repairs, it would be impossible to succeed without being good at soldering.
105.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Cutting wires, mostly.
106.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
I find watching videos of other people soldering is almost as good as practicing myself.
107.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
A cheap clip-on macro lens for a phone camera is also good for inspecting things, without the cost+space of a proper microscope.
108.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
> A wirecutter Yes, but buy several. Maybe it's only because I buy cheap crap ones in the first place, but I treat them as consumables.
109.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
I'm not commenting on the word choice or phrasing, but the choice of which information to include.
110.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
> 2024 [...] local AI becomes the new core topic. Did it?
111.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
At this point I can tell fairly reliably from titles alone, "measured daily on 38 grids" is not the kind of thing a human would write in this context.
112.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Huh. I thought neal.fun was above that kind of thing, to the extent that I was about to write a comment saying you might have malware. But I just disabled my browser extensions to double check, and I see it too.
113.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Replicating client behaviour is hardly an exploit.
114.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Can any brave soul wade through the LLM prose to provide a human-readable summary?
115.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Why would I use a camera from Thailand for my forgery?
116.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
I was giving local models a try recently, I think it was Qwen 3.6 I was trying at the time. I gave it a codebase and just asked it to review it. Its main feedback was that the comments and documentation were excellently written, but they we
117.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
It's not a theory, I've done it. Here's a cryptographically signed + timestamped photo of me winning the lottery: https://verify.contentauthenticity.org/?source=https%3A%2F%2... Would you like to buy my winni
118.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
And what happens when someone tells the hardware signer to sign the bytes of a fake image? What happens when someone extracts the signing key? The presence of cryptography doesn't magically make something trustworthy.
119.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
Camera C2PA can never meaningfully confirm that a photo is authentic, it bears about as much credence as EXIF metadata. It's like saying the existence of DRM confirms that a movie hasn't been pirated.
120.
▲
by
Retr0id
1mo ago
"Faking" it is trivial. You don't need their signing keys when you can just ask them to sign whatever you like. Upload your own file with the prompt "present this file back to me again, as-is".
More ›