Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Refreeze5224
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
6mo ago
That won't work. The issue is a fundamental power imbalance being exploited by the seller. An individual will never have the time, money, or energy to be on an equal footing with companies that do this. So giving people a bunch of algo
62.
▲
We Need to Talk About the IPv8 Draft
(shitwolfymakes.substack.com)
1 points
by
Refreeze5224
6mo ago
|
0 comments
63.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
6mo ago
Thank you for doing your part to keep webapp pentesters in business.
64.
▲
Austerity Creates Fascism
(pluralistic.net)
56 points
by
Refreeze5224
6mo ago
|
28 comments
65.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
6mo ago
This time there are serious national security and sovereignty issues driving the change though, which are much more powerful motivations to succeed.
66.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
Serious answer: cops are not accountable for their behavior, in the vast majority of cases.
67.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
> I don't care to comment on what they may be hiding. And yet you subject the rest of us to your conspiratorial ramblings.
68.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
Please don't just post slop anyone else could have gotten from AI. It undermines the entire purpose of this site, and reduces the quality of discourse drastically.
69.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
The real story here is that civil contempt can net you an indefinite prison sentence without a conviction, and if you're lucky a judge will decide to let you out. Over something you may or may not even know.
70.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
Have you not ever heard of The Register? It's not a news site, it's intentionally opinionated. And the headline is accurate anyway....
71.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
No, the assumption is that companies are more interested in cutting labor costs than productivity. Even if you screw up and need to hire back 50% of those you fired, you still cut the labor costs of the 50% still fired. And you can pretend
72.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
You're mixing up what AI is for compared to horses and cars. Horses/cars enable people to be more efficient. AI enables companies to fire people. Horses/cars improve productivity. AI reduces payroll costs. That's the
73.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
We can't handle unchecked pursuit of profit, freedom isn't the issue.
74.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
It is, and I have no doubt that is the entire point, despite them "thinking of the children."
75.
▲
Ad-tech is fascist tech
(pluralistic.net)
13 points
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
|
1 comments
76.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
This one is for all the Facebook and Google employees that still seem to think they are merely "solving hard problems at scale" or "connecting people".
77.
▲
Billionaires are a danger to themselves and (especially) us
(pluralistic.net)
17 points
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
|
1 comments
78.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
He's a troll.
79.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
I think you're mistaking what's happening here. Companies are not discovering greed. People are finally recognizing that greed, and the greed inherent in the system, and recognizing that just because it's "part of the sy
80.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
7mo ago
War is the poor dying for the rich. The only way to pay respect to those who have died at the behest of the rich is to explicitly recognize who sent them, why they were sent, and to do everything we can to prevent it happening again.
81.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
A fundamental attribute of capitalism is that labor costs are a regrettable cost center, and any reduction in labor costs without a resulting loss in profit/ perceived productivity is a big win. AI is a big win for capitalists, and no
82.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
It's simple: it's just a lie. We are seeing the goal of AI in action here, which is reducing payroll costs.
83.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
This is totally true, if you ignore the entire history of taxation in the United States during the 19th and 20th centuries.
84.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
Yeah, screw Robert Reich! Always looking out for the workers who make up the majority of this country. Why won't he look out for the poor multi-national corporations, who have no one to advocate for them or their tax rates?
85.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
That's because you are intentionally not included in it. Only him and his rich owning class buddies are, the rest of us are only profit-generating NPCs.
86.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
Kinda does a number on the whole "literal word of god" thing doesn't it?
87.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
SCOTUS rules for the rich and powerful. Most of the time Trump is aligned with them. Sometimes he does dumb shit like tariffs, or things that upset the order the rich and powerful want to maintain, and they rule against him.
88.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
Constant fear.
89.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
> I asked AI to help and it told me why it was broken and how to fix it, and also fixed it for me. This is just it, you didn't learn anything here. In 3 months, you will only remember that AI fixed some issue for you. You will hav
90.
▲
by
Refreeze5224
8mo ago
> The boring parts where you learn. Exactly this. Finding that annoying bug that took 15 browser tabs and digging deep into some library you're using, digging into where your code is not performant, looking for alternative algorithm
More ›