4 ms·

It is, and I have no doubt that is the entire point, despite them "thinking of the children."

• fidotron 7mo ago
  The Canadian version of this is especially cynical: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c309y25prnlo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c309y25prnlo
  • Eddy_Viscosity2 7mo ago
    That article was about people suing openAI.
    • fidotron 7mo ago
      It contains "The plaintiffs allege no age verification took place on the site." As if this is a problem.
      • dekken_ 7mo ago
        As if parents aren't responsible for the actions of their children
  • _verandaguy 7mo ago
    To be clear: this is civil action by a family, not the position of the Government of Canada.
    • fidotron 7mo ago
      There is no meaningful distinction, which is why a civil case in a foreign country is picked up by the BBC. Furthermore, the Gov are trying to deflect on to OpenAI (and the internet) because a huge part of the failings in that case involve them seizing the weapons from the perpetrator, and then giving them back.
• 21asdffdsa12 7mo ago
  Im sure the likes of prince andrew and keir starmers advisors think way to much the children