Ray20

41 ms·

421.
by Ray20 2y ago
>reasonable to think and plan ahead, especially when we are dealing with someone who is refusing to acknowledged a democratic loss. >This is not theoretical, we know how he reacts when he looses a election. It sounds like from your pe
422.
by Ray20 2y ago
>Turns out investing in your own people returns dividends. Unfortunately, the current administration is divesting from the American people. As we see, in the case of America, these dividends are much larger. So much larger that they are
423.
by Ray20 2y ago
And what place they are holding on starvation index and children mortality rate?
424.
by Ray20 2y ago
>aspects like democracy, press and political freedom or gender equality We are literally talking about country, where half the population are starving and 10 percent of children are DYING. But yeah, girls are dying not worse than boys, s
425.
by Ray20 2y ago
You are buying Soviet propaganda. Just an example of what what happening in Khrustchev times for expressing a dissatisfaction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novocherkassk_massacre
426.
by Ray20 2y ago
>The number of non-disgusting governments world in space-capable nations currently sits at zero. You are now trivializing institutionalized mass oppression. We're talking about a country where HALF THE POPULATION IS STARVING RIGHT N
427.
by Ray20 2y ago
>Even among its peasants No, it wasn't. This is Soviet propaganda, that existed only because people who expressed different opinions were killed. As far as I understand, the situation in Botswana is much better when it comes to expr
428.
by Ray20 2y ago
>Let me tell you how we actually feel about it here. Can we have the opinion not from some privileged elites, but of the oppressed majority, who are literally starving to involuntarily under threat of execution finance all this support p
429.
by Ray20 2y ago
I think this is a very weak essay. The author has zero ability to analyze, self-reflect, and think through her actions even one step ahead. The video literally starts off by complaining about how expensive the software is while simultaneous
430.
by Ray20 2y ago
Perhaps it was precisely because they were not so skilled?
431.
by Ray20 2y ago
>This in turn cuts business to blue collar service providers. No, it doesn't. Where's that is come from? I mean, look at the situation from the perspective of blue collar service providers: what is exactly those goods and servi
432.
by Ray20 2y ago
>When there are fewer consumers in a market, demand for products and services declines. No, demand is unlimited and defined by the amount of production. >You don't get to unemploy big chunks of the population and expect business
433.
by Ray20 2y ago
My views on this issue are shaped by history. Starting with crop production and plowing and ending with book printing, conveyor belts and microelectronics - creating tools that increase productivity has always led to increased availability
434.
by Ray20 2y ago
>who are willing to actually spend that money Money mean nothing. It is simply medium of exchange. The question is, is there anything to exchange? And the answer is yeas, and position of white collar workers doesn't affect availabil
435.
by Ray20 2y ago
> it's value decreases I mean yeas, values of consumed goods will decrease, so blue color workers will be able to consume more. That's exactly what is called increase of income.
436.
by Ray20 2y ago
>I think you underestimate just how hard these AI companies hammer services Yeas, I completely don't understand this and don't understand comparing this with ddos attacks. There's no difference with what search engines are
437.
by Ray20 2y ago
Why not? Considering how cheap they are (we are talking about less than 10 dollars for 4-6 inch display with relatively high resolution and controller for this display).
438.
by Ray20 2y ago
>do you think that would not affect incomes of those who are the current blue collar class? Obviously it is affect. Supply of goods are increased and their relative market value are increased - how can this not increase their incomes?
439.
by Ray20 2y ago
>The proclaimed goal is to displace workers on a grand scale. It doesn't matter. What you need to understand - is that in the source of the job market is needs, ability to meet those needs and ability to exchanges those ability on o
440.
by Ray20 2y ago
I think uncontrolled price of cloud traffic - is a real fraud and way bigger problem then some AI companies that ignore robot.txt. One time we went over limit on Netlify or something, and they charged over thousand for a couple TB.
441.
by Ray20 2y ago
>if everyone's broke >nobody's spending money on stuff like contractors, mechanics, and other hardcore blue collar trades. Why would this happen? Money is simply a medium of exchange of values that this contractors, mechanic
442.
by Ray20 2y ago
That's a laughable idea. Job market is formed by the presence of needs and the presence of the ability to satisfy them. AI - does not reduce the ability to satisfy needs, so only possible situation where you won't be able to compe
443.
by Ray20 2y ago
You don't understand how this works, do you? By paying workers because of strikes, you are increasing the number of strikes.
444.
by Ray20 2y ago
>It would be so great if the rest of the world could take inspiration from Switzerland and Japan regarding train management. I would be glad to hear more about their success in the train management. Probably starting with one of the most
445.
by Ray20 2y ago
>A fair point, but there are some circumstances where both employee and employer may need to justify/document such circumstances -- but on the whole, you're spot on. I think we should also make it common practice to share groce
446.
by Ray20 2y ago
Take almost any secular country with a predominantly Muslim population - and this is exactly what is happening there. In all commercial livestock production slaughter is carried out by special workers with special religious education - pure
447.
by Ray20 2y ago
Will there be any downsides?
448.
by Ray20 2y ago
>If businesses have opportunity to cut their operational variable costs >25%, than one can be fairly certain these facilities won't be located on US soil. Is there opportunity? Lower risks and energy prices may well outweigh the
449.
by Ray20 2y ago
I think it is associated with fascism, just from the other party. This is pretty common fascist practice that is used all over Europe and in any left-leaning countries, when with regulations governments make doing business on large scale im
450.
by Ray20 2y ago
It seems Microsoft is not betting on C# and I think the main reason for this is that C# isn't futureproof because of it's ugliness. It is a powerful and robust language with great standard library, but you just cant be comfortable

More ›