Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RHSeeger
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
121.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
The Roborock is what I have, and I've had no complaints; the Q5 Max+. With some googly eyes, it's pretty cute :)
122.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> In order for the Romo, or really any modern autonomous vacuum, to function it needs to constantly collect visual data from the building it is operating in. I specifically bought one without a camera or mic.
123.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> Most developers type a prompt, sometimes use plan mode, fix the errors, repeat. > ... > never let Claude write code until you’ve reviewed and approved a written plan I certainly always work towards an approved plan before I let i
124.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
Thank you for... agreeing with me? I didn't say there weren't reasons for imprisonment. I said that "he hasn't paid for his crime enough" is not a good reason.
125.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> How do you know whether a murderer won't be a repeat murderer? I don't know. I just don't believe "but he hasn't paid for his crime _enough_" isn't helpful.
126.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
That's a fair statement, and I agree in general. I guess my stance is more that "more time" time not really help much with that. I'm sure there's a connection, but it's not linear.
127.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> As many of them acknowledge, they have been rightly punished for a long time. But, ask yourself as you watch the video, how long is long enough? I am of the opinion that incarceration should be "for the benefit of society";
128.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
Unfortunately, the rule of no duplicate questions also destroyed lots of questions that weren't duplicates... because _someone_ couldn't be bothered to read them and realize it wasn't the same. Plus, there were a lot of fun q
129.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
My take was that it's not > We should hate/destroy this technology because it will cause significant short term harm, in exchange for great long term gains. Rather > We should acknowledge that this technology will cause sign
130.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> the existing strategic stalemates are broken Claude, go hack <my enemy nation-state> and find me ways to cause them harm that are unlikely be noticed until it is too late for them to act on it.
131.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
I've been blocked from joining the discord of some games I play because I refuse to enter a phone number.
132.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
I hear there's female engineers nowadays, too.
133.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> if you don't use it you should blame only yourself that your messages are not accepted I think it's a gray area - If the receiver declines your message because "Message-id" is required - then I blame the receiver;
134.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
I bought a new car last year (my first actual _new_ car, vs pre-owned) and one of my most important features was a 360 camera. That extra visibility is just amazing for safety. Another was a HUD. Being able to see how fast I'm going, w
135.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
So... Money is generally how we describe value for those things which can be traded for
136.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> Society is telling your friend that her work is not particularly valuable and that she should probably consider doing something else. Challenge > I don’t think it would be possible without the tax exemption. ^ That tax exemption _is
137.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> > There are ways to do better. A national holiday for elections has been mentioned countless times. > Sure. But let’s get rid of all early voting and mail in balloting. No excuses right? Throw in voter id too. Why does having a d
138.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
> A national holiday for elections has been mentioned countless times. Many people already do get the option to ditch out of work to go vote. And it's not logistically possible for _everyone_ to have the day off. So really this is j
139.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
It's not the character, its the way / context in which it's used https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_umlaut
140.
▲
by
RHSeeger
8mo ago
I think the specific examples of the first group there undersell it. They make it sound like the group isn't getting a lot of power out of the AI. The things I use it as a tool for include - Peer reviews. Not the only peer review of co
141.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
> >They arrest and deport US citizens > This is systematically not true as citizens can not be legally deported. And yet > The true scope of U.S. citizens wrongfully deported is not known as the federal government does not relea
142.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
This. The government doing bad things is a political topic. How the government is using technology to do bad things is both a political and technology topic.
143.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
Are you saying that, because there is one way in which people are vulnerable, that it doesn't matter if we add more ways they are vulnerable? Because that makes no sense whatsoever.
144.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
But there are people trying to hide their locations even though they are here legally; because ICE has made it very clear they don't care if you're here legally or not. They arrest and deport US citizens. They arrest and deport pe
145.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
I'd rather ICE (or whatever government agency) not see my data... because, even if there are processes that are enforced, there might not be tomorrow. If that data isn't collected in the first place, that threat vector disappears.
146.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
There is 0 difference. None. There's not even a line to cross. > legally collected data In both cases, the information is legally collected (or at least, that's the only data we're concerned about in this conversation). -
147.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
Or the person that takes over after them
148.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
> The NSA knowing your search history is no big deal (as long as you're not looking for anything illegal) Until someone at or above the TSA decides they don't like you. And then they use your search history to blackmail you. Be
149.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
Challenge. Laws cannot an action a crime after it was committed. However, - Civil rules can and do impact things retroactively - Laws may not make something illegal retroactively, but the interpretation of a law can suddenly change; which w
150.
▲
by
RHSeeger
9mo ago
And, to be realistic, "add AI to everything" is a sure sign that the person does _not_ understand AI.
More ›