R0b0t1

75 ms·

751.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
This is far beyond that. The doctors are brazenly prioritizing "not being bothered" over the health of their patients. Over prescription of antipsychotics is still common in US psychiatric facilities, and even if not there are alt
752.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
They have, it's called mixmaster/mixminion. It hasn't seen much use since it was introduced.
753.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Unsure that is a sound direction. https://www.mixminion.net/ is defunct but it and its predecessor paid close attention to metadata removal. It's basically Tor but with variable, high latency. It never took off, you ne
754.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
No, it's not the main concern usually. Most people who are anti-GMO are against the gene editing part and its potential effects on the human genome. If you probe deeply enough you realize there's not much there.
755.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
https://sci-hub.st/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001673 from 2014, but this has been known for decades if not centuries. A lay explanation at https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-study-fi
756.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
This stuff is presented in middleschool and highschool health classes and pretty much everywhere on the internet if you look for life improvement advice. Weight is perhaps the single most strongly linked indicator of life expectancy. What i
757.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I was given the paperwork for this program on my first dose, I got it early.
758.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
You are wrong. There are great volumes of evidence that keeping a low weight and keeping macronutrients roughly in some gap makes you live longer. I'm not sure what is left to be talking about. Specific fad diets?
759.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I agree, a lot of problems seem to stem from over-reliance on federal authority to solve problems. It can get a bit reductionist but people are essentially mad they are not able to live in the way they want.
760.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
There's a system in india where mercy killings are normal and there are plenty of stories of families plotting to kill their elders. It could end up like that if normalized.
761.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Drivers work, there's just no games. So if you want to train ML models go for it.
762.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
No option sans degree, I assume? Or at least reasonable compensation while pursuing one.
763.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
The problem with GMO life is an organism trying to reproduce plus your goal is inherently less fit than an organism merely trying to reproduce. This really only works at accelerating a reset after a mass die off.
764.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It's "easier" to capture from water in chemical terms but harder to actually move the water. I think the economy of moving the weight of water makes this a nonstarter. Also yes, ocean acidification is likely to be the bigger
765.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
That makes no sense. If land affects the value of the land around it then it had to have gone up. If you put 10 family dwellings on land, then its value is at least that of 10 family dwellings. So each individual renter is somehow paying
766.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It's achievable (for most people I suspect frequent HN, anyway) if you put away a couple months of disposable income. If you don't care about playing games on it it's about the same cost as a high end gaming computer, and wha
767.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Two options: the claimed IP on the interface is removed or said to never have existed in the first place, and/or prevent bootloader locking. First one is a very good idea, as older IP law actually holds that interfaces aren't copy
768.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Overly optimistic. If you stack 10 family homes the land is now 10x more valuable and gets taxed accordingly.
769.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
The goal isn't to pack people on the planet like sardines.
770.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
People aren't paying huge sums for houses or paying for new construction, property developers are.
771.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I must sincerely ask you if you read my original comment and the person I am replying to: As population density increases, desirability increases, and people may try investing with the goal of renting, which with an LVT will more sharply de
772.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
On paper, yes, but it'll just get passed on to the renter.
773.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It depends. If owned land is converted for rent then the LVT is passed on to the tenant. To avoid paying the LVT tenants are incentivized to own, which may imply buying new construction. As population density increases, desirability increas
774.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I like it too, but it seems to incentivize sprawl. If people attempt to lease land the LVT will be passed to their tenants. To avoid paying the LVT, tenants will look for new construction.
775.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Home prices are up because there is no supply. There's no supply because people can't afford to build houses. The issue isn't home ownership, it's the lack of it. An LVT might work but I think it is only ethical if you
776.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
That's true, now we can go back and simplify, I was more speaking to the origination of all of these horrible things. Nobody knew when they picked 2048 instead of 1024 it was going to matter, but then suddenly it did and nobody wrote d
777.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
If you have money usually you can just buy these things. At the start of COVID, for example, I had access to COVID tests before most of the market (at a huge premium) via work. They really did not care who bought it. At worst create some pa
778.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Hindsight is 20/20.
779.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It depends? T level normalcy is a rolling average, and there's been a decrease if you go back far enough. Same thing with sperm count.
780.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Look for stories of people who are post-op or have gone a large portion of their life as trans. Sometimes they end up figuring out it's not for them. In most of those cases, it's not really that they were tricked or coerced, it&#x

More ›