QCman

4 ms·

1.
by QCman 10y ago
Many of the points made why successful organizations invest in new technologies are very weak. Successful organizations got that way by making many more smart decisions than dumb decisions. Occam’s razor suggests that organizations investin
2.
by QCman 10y ago
Several universities and corporations have QC R&D projects (eg. Alibaba, Google, IBM, Microsoft); none have their QC machines in production for anything (in fact they don't even have customers). Something to think about.
3.
by QCman 10y ago
Several universities and corporations have QC R&D projects (eg. Alibaba, Google, IBM, Microsoft); none of these corporations have customers for their QCs.
4.
by QCman 10y ago
Here is MIT Technology Review's article on www.kindred.ai Kindred AI is teaching robots new tasks using human virtual-reality “pilots.” The ultimate goal is to create a new kind of artificial intelligence. Kindred AI is teaching robots
5.
by QCman 10y ago
This is what LANL has to say... http://www.lanl.gov/discover/publications/1663/2016-july/not...
6.
by QCman 10y ago
OK, but that doesn't explain why D-Wave has so many paying customers (Google, NASA, Lockheed Martin, Los Alamos National Labs, University of Southern California, Temporal Defense Systems, US government, CIA/In-Q-Tel).
7.
by QCman 10y ago
Do you have information not available to the organizations that have spent over $60M on D-Wave computers? Why are you wasting your time here?
8.
by QCman 10y ago
The actual price for a D-Wave machine is more than $10M. It's a good sign that the first customers have continued their support by upgrading to the newer models.
9.
by QCman 10y ago
Here's the list of D-Wave supporters (organizations that have spent real $): Google, NASA, Lockheed Martin, Los Alamos National Labs, University of Southern California, Temporal Defense Systems, US government, CIA/In-Q-Tel. At ov