Pudini

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Pudini 6y ago

   Obviously not. Which is the point in using the word obvious, obviously. Namely, using it to feel superior or to not provide a better argument.
2. 2.▲
   by Pudini 6y ago

   I think you are being silly. What's moral or amoral is dependant on whatever he is feeling at the moment. I very much doubt he has defined it.
3. 3.▲
   by Pudini 6y ago

   Obviously saying it is not obviously true is false if 0.999... == 1.0
4. 4.▲
   by Pudini 7y ago

   Alternatively, learn not to accept death and start that life goal of making it something that is a sad, rare event instead of part of the human nature.
5. 5.▲
   by Pudini 8y ago

   If it’s a protocol, there should be an option to just drop the incomming packets and go on with one’s life. This. Now if any of those influencers could start a campaign to make a short signal socially acceptable for "drop communicati
6. 6.▲
   by Pudini 8y ago

   So: 30 guns fired / 10.10^6 people vs 1 000 police murders / 325.10^6 people. 3.10^-6 guns fired per capita vs 3.10^-6 murders per capita. Couldn't find the Swedish police murders stats. I'd estimate on their police murd
7. 7.▲
   by Pudini 8y ago

   Alternative: The actual universe has so much computational power that having thinking beings inside a simulation is low cost. If you are inside the simulation, you don't know the actual universe's rules. Thinking beings being more