PrudenceYuris

4 ms·

1.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
That's a good point regarding the petition, which is why direct action against these people should not be limited to signing the petition. Indeed, they should be harried out of their professional and private lives as thoroughly and relentle
2.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Which is why efforts to end her career should go forward with as little restraint as her prosecution
3.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
That is a curious argument. The point of this petition, and everything else done to remove Ortiz, Heymann, and Garland is that it is a repeatable process. Making a spectacular example of Ortiz et. al. is a first step, but it's a fine first
4.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Crowdsourcing the destruction of the career of an out-of-control prosecutor is a repeatable process, and, as Internet forums gain mass, a process that will get easier to apply. In other words, this is the public perception of crime on the m
5.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Look to the Tunisian fruit merchant who self-immolated. Suicide as protest is with us today.
6.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Her political ambitions, professional contact network, and post-DoJ employment prospects could be destroyed, costing her millions of dollars in income. Same for Heymann. Knowing that hundreds of thousands of people in an industry they inter
7.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
He and his family members have numerous computing industry connections in their network. Turn these connections against him, and isolate him. David E. Green is VP public policy at NBC Universal. He should be aware of what a pariah Heymann i
8.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Here is half the phone conversation from tomorrow morning: Mr. President, one of your appointees made it to the top of the petition list... No, sir, it's not good news Shall we draft a response for your approval? No you don't know her perso
9.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Duplicate. This one has 1500 signatures already: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/remove-united-stat...
10.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
"she did not do anything wrong" That's a pretty arrogant statement in light of the general opinion regarding this case. It's also arrogant to think that someone, somewhere, will not find some means to destroy her career when at least tens o
11.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Congress is bought and elections are a choice among the bought. We are dealing with prideful arrogant people. They need a vivid example in order to get their attention. Destroying this case's prosecutors' careers is only a good start.
12.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Hate the game or play the game. Destroying her reputation. Stripping her of every professional friendship by making her a pariah. Piling on in every conceivable forum against her. Making it cost her every every she ever earned, her home, he
13.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Stephen P. Heymann deserves special attention. He worked for the "Security Division" of EMC. He may have a past record of inflating small exploits with no criminal intent into federal cases. We don't need lawyers like that practising tech l
14.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Her entire career, professional circle, and reputational supports have made an error in backing her, and they need to hear that directly. She hounded someone to suicide, and the repercussions for that are light if they are limited to ending
15.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
You need to reread that. Contact her professional network, and let them know you don't approve of her actions. No tar. No feathers. Just make your own opinion known in the circles that matter to her career.
16.
by PrudenceYuris 14y ago
Then do something about it. This prosecutor is quite the collector and displayer of awards: http://www.necc.mass.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Carmen-O... She is a PR asset to this university: http://www.pr.com/press-release/366324 Evi