Proven

373 ms·

241.
by Proven 8y ago
Crime expert, huh? How stupid someone has to be to steal someone's food day in day out (and eventually get caught, beaten or worse) when they can "steal" something that belongs to no individual and get away with it? If the an
242.
by Proven 8y ago
WTF, a company gets bought, they switch from one free software to another after two days ... okay without any testing. Doesn't make any sense, technical or other. Clickbait article.
243.
by Proven 8y ago
> Is it because of bad laws? No, it's because of the good laws. Taxation is theft. And it's not called tax evasion but tax planning. No one is obliged to pay more than the minimum.
244.
by Proven 8y ago
Can't say I noticed many ads of any kind (either pro or anti) on YouTube in the past 2-3 years. I demonetized all of YouTube a long time ago. Whatever ads do play or recommended continent appears, I distrust them and never click on it
245.
by Proven 8y ago
Big deal. Why should we care? Anyone can fork and mirror it where they want, and make it accessible to anonymous users. Sure, that would "inconvenience" some users, but so what? Github doesn't exist to please every single per
246.
by Proven 8y ago
Saw that the other day, not bad... Finally a market based approach to measuring the value (many) users get from FB and quite refreshing compared to the usual "I know what's best for you" approach. Edit: I don't use FB, b
247.
by Proven 8y ago
Each to his own. It doesn’t bother me that it doesn’t bother them. It also doesn’t mean it shouldn’t bother me if the government I live under were to introduce a similar system.
248.
by Proven 8y ago
There’s no surveillance capitalism. In capitalism you have property rights. That being so, your private information can be protected and hence “capitalized” upon (pun intended) by the owner because in free market you would be able to sell i
249.
by Proven 8y ago
I always disable IPv6 at home and computers I administer. IPv6: for machines (IoT) IPv4: for humans
250.
by Proven 8y ago
Personally I make an effort to not contribute to any freedom-limiting software (GPL 2.0 is already bad enough, but GPL 3 is way worse). I explicitly check for GPL 3 and make sure I don't help in any way. The alienation created by the c
251.
by Proven 8y ago
It's (the idea to manage on prem K8S from the cloud) a reaction to 1) Hyperscalers doing hybrid cloud 2) VMware's growingly independent approach to K8S (which I believe will ultimately result in VMware offering "generic"
252.
by Proven 8y ago
Socialist mambo jumbo! An exchange doesn't favor the seller - it favors both parties for they wish to rid of what they want less in exchange for what they want more. But that even isn't the point - it doesn't matter who might
253.
by Proven 8y ago
The government should do precisely NOTHING. The jobs don't belong to workers, so the premise is entirely wrong to begin with.
254.
by Proven 8y ago
Simply speaking they actually make more products people like to use. Google essentially has just one, and it’s based on diminishing user privacy to the maximum extent possible. MS collects user data but so do Ubuntu and CentOS... not to the
255.
by Proven 9y ago
I like it, but it's been a long wait. It seems only x64 at first. Devuan will do okay. Simple and stable distros will always have loyal users.
256.
by Proven 10y ago
Why the hell does chess need to be divided by sexes? Ridiculous! Kudos to her for competing with the best.
257.
by Proven 10y ago
To a normal person the title is an argument against taxation. To a socialist it's the proof that taxes ought to be higher.
258.
by Proven 10y ago
"Consumer demand is starting to shift in favor of electrified vehicles and has strong disruption potential" Bull. It's a joke to talk about customer "demand" when a single damn car hasn't been sold without gove
259.
by Proven 10y ago
I call BS. I have 0 use for it. I wouldn't disable it as a matter of best practice, but it's too annoying.
260.
by Proven 10y ago
"But for the most part, according to a BNEF analysis, the costs of new projects would need to drop by half in order to be profitable on a wider scale in California, and that’s not likely to happen for another decade" The plunder c
261.
by Proven 10y ago
1) Apple doesn't get away with anything, they've lost market share. 2) Nobody is forced to buy an iPhone Stop whining.
262.
by Proven 10y ago
... and also "may" not matter at all. Glad to see gender-focused research is going on, though.
263.
by Proven 10y ago
Great! Less money to the government, less problems for the people!
264.
by Proven 10y ago
Socialist nonsense. If he had some common sense instead of PhD, he would have "uncovered" the grim truth that the State is the source of most violence and inequality.
265.
by Proven 10y ago
I don't think ancaps are all like that. You can't run business if you don't serve your customers well. Does that translate into pathological selfishness and other extreme behavior that goes in customers' nerves? I don&#x
266.
by Proven 10y ago
Exit the EU and problem solved, as well as many other problems.
267.
by Proven 10y ago
LOL, yeah right they "represent" you. You wouldn't need that site if they did.