PrivWeeble

5 ms·

1.
by PrivWeeble 9y ago
At least we have some control over the exposures discussed in the paper. Very many companies are exposing (sensitive) information to third-party email delivery services, customer feedback and polling services, etc. Thus creating a privacy
2.
by PrivWeeble 9y ago
Well normally you wouldn't want one browser extension to interfere with another extension. However, there are contexts where that is very beneficial. Take a security or privacy extension which correctly identifies a harmful resour
3.
by PrivWeeble 9y ago
And if Google takes steps to prevent third-party ad blockers from working in Chrome? Or renders them worthless through exceptions to the filtering API? Even if you ignore Google's Funding Choices and its potential to increase adoption
4.
by PrivWeeble 9y ago
That's like saying antibiotics are only meant to kill the worst of one's infection. Unfortunately, there are foolish people who assume a lower dose/dosage will suffice. Even after an M.D. assesses what they need and tells t
5.
by PrivWeeble 9y ago
Which is better than exchanging the raw personal identifiers, but still isn't "safe" from a privacy point of view. One or both parties often hold PII and other personal info, and they know which of that is associated with a
6.
by PrivWeeble 9y ago
Either side learning that one of their customers is also a customer of the other company would be a significant privacy issue in some scenarios. If comparison identifiers are derived from an email address then there would likely be cases w