Podgajski

10 ms·

61.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Because it’s overbought and most of the coins are at island tops. If you don’t know what an island top is, look it up. Plus, the house always wins, and you ain’t the house.
62.
by Podgajski 3y ago
This is the ultimate idiotic abstraction of financial capitalism that I have seen yet. What value does investing or trading in bitcoin bring to the economy? Absolutely none! And you all wonder why there’s rampant inflation and the huge sepa
63.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I don’t know what you’re talking about. Literally everyone was saying it was going to happen. And how bitcoin is going to crash because you’re all suckers.
64.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Housing for Ukrainians? Are these people serious? They think this is a good thing to brag about right now? With all the homelessness and housing troubles in the United States we’re building housing to give it to people who don’t even live h
65.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Sell the news.
66.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Better sell now…
67.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Better sell now….
68.
by Podgajski 3y ago
You’re missing the simplicity of my point. Yes I said EMF affect us, and that was supposed to include everything. The fact that we’re adding new and different EMFs is the point. There’s a very fact that it’s highly unrecognized by psychiatr
69.
by Podgajski 3y ago
My point is that RFEMF may affect behavior and mood. This only adds to the biological stress of doom scrolling all day. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132...
70.
by Podgajski 3y ago
If there might be a problem, then we should investigate it, correct? But instead, we’re just rolling it out more and more and faster faster. Whatever happened to the precautionary principal and health?
71.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I’m not, I’ve been at this for a while. It’s very strong bias of those in the tech industry that there’s no problem with radio frequency electromagnetic radiation. I was the same way. I was a network engineer for Cisco Systems from 1996 to
72.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Unfortunately, there’s not, annd unfortunately a lot of it is really bad. I would just keep up with the studies that are being published and the sources of their funding. The website the environmental health trust has a lot of material that
73.
by Podgajski 3y ago
> This is the kind of broad brush statement that makes people face-palm. A "voltage gated" anything is necessarily affected by electromagnetic fields, because that's what those words mean… It’s not a broadbrush statement,
74.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Did we evolve with the polarized pulsed microwave radiation from man-made devices? Or Did we evolve with the non-polarized radiation from the sun? You cannot compare that. The proof of this is that the FCC has safety regulations against how
75.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I can’t prove it to other people. I proved it to myself, but when other people want proof, they don’t sit down with me to investigate it. I’m not arguing that not ionizing radiation causes cancer. I’m arguing that it causes neurological pro
76.
by Podgajski 3y ago
If you look closely at what Tech wellness sells, you’ll find that all of it is scientifically proven. It’s not like they’re selling crystals or pendants. Go ahead and show me one thing there that you think does not block electromagnetic rad
77.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I already told you what I purchased. Now you’re just trolling me and it’s useless to continue with you. I was a freaking network engineer I think I know how science works.
78.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I’m noticing you created this account six hours ago and I’m the only one you’ve had any interaction with. Is that you Apple?
79.
Cannabinoids Block Cellular Entry of SARS-CoV-2 and the Emerging Variants (2022)(pubs.acs.org)
18 points by Podgajski 3y ago|2 comments
80.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I have a google scholar alert for it and I read every study no matter the result. Why wouldnt I?
81.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Do you just say things without even verifying them with a quick search? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799025/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/article
82.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I have an acoustimeter am-11 which measures RF radiation up to 8 GHz and a 50Hz meter which measures both electric and magnetic field separately. The area I measure is close to my body, not near the source cause that would be stupid. I meas
83.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Let’s just look at one of the studies. What was the conclusion? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00139 ... “If such individuals exist, they represent a small minority and have not be
84.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Why is it weird that I connect ion channels? They’ve been shown to be affected by EMFs. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33945157/ Here, we systematically clarify how neuronal ion channels are particularly affected and
85.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I just read from someone else that the puck is only the battery that the Wi-Fi is in the headset. So just imagine strapping a Wi-Fi router to your head!
86.
by Podgajski 3y ago
The studies don’t only include people who are genetically susceptible to EMFs. so if only one and 10 people have the sensitivity, the probability they will be in the studies are reduced. Then you have the problem in the studies of people cl
87.
by Podgajski 3y ago
No one wants to work with me to prove it. Of there is anyone here that wants to help me I am open to it. I am homeless and on disability.
88.
by Podgajski 3y ago
Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914
89.
by Podgajski 3y ago
This is the second time I’ve read this Mr. interpretation of sunlight being polarized on hacker news. Sunlight is not polarized. When you use a polarizing filter, you are polarizing the light. That’s why they call them polarizing filters. S
90.
by Podgajski 3y ago
I’ve done it, which is why I’m so certain it affects me. I’ve had people help me do it.

More ›