3 ms·

Unfortunately, there’s not, annd unfortunately a lot of it is really bad. I would just keep up with the studies that are being published and the sources of thei

Unfortunately, there’s not, annd unfortunately a lot of it is really bad. I would just keep up with the studies that are being published and the sources of their funding. The website the environmental health trust has a lot of material that I would categorize as mostly reliable. https://ehtrust.org/ https://ehtrust.org/

meiraleal 3y ago
I think it is very unfair that your reply was flagged while the same level theory of OP comment is top ranked.
- Podgajski 3y ago
  I’m not, I’ve been at this for a while. It’s very strong bias of those in the tech industry that there’s no problem with radio frequency electromagnetic radiation. I was the same way. I was a network engineer for Cisco Systems from 1996 to 2000. I would’ve said the same thing before I realized it affected me in the late 201Os. There’s been such strong propaganda from the telecommunications industry because of the money involved. Just the fact that people keep saying “radiation comes from the sun as well” is proof of this fact sis, it ignores the fundamental science of how radio frequency telecommunications work. Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to comment about my post being flagged. I’m not gonna post on hacker news anymore, there’s just too much noise.
  - meiraleal 3y ago
    I don't deny radio frequency electromagnetic radiation could be harmful. But clearly the change is behavioral and it is not the radiation that makes teenagers doomscroll 16 hours/day.
    - Podgajski 3y ago
      My point is that RFEMF may affect behavior and mood. This only adds to the biological stress of doom scrolling all day. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651321010927 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132...
      - meiraleal 3y ago
        I think that's a lazy excuse, the same as saying the food in US is worse so that's the reason for the fat epidemic, not excessive eating mixed with a widespread sedentary lifestyle

meiraleal 3y ago

I think it is very unfair that your reply was flagged while the same level theory of OP comment is top ranked.

Podgajski 3y ago
I’m not, I’ve been at this for a while. It’s very strong bias of those in the tech industry that there’s no problem with radio frequency electromagnetic radiation. I was the same way. I was a network engineer for Cisco Systems from 1996 to 2000. I would’ve said the same thing before I realized it affected me in the late 201Os. There’s been such strong propaganda from the telecommunications industry because of the money involved. Just the fact that people keep saying “radiation comes from the sun as well” is proof of this fact sis, it ignores the fundamental science of how radio frequency telecommunications work. Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to comment about my post being flagged. I’m not gonna post on hacker news anymore, there’s just too much noise.
- meiraleal 3y ago
  I don't deny radio frequency electromagnetic radiation could be harmful. But clearly the change is behavioral and it is not the radiation that makes teenagers doomscroll 16 hours/day.
  - Podgajski 3y ago
    My point is that RFEMF may affect behavior and mood. This only adds to the biological stress of doom scrolling all day. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651321010927 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132...
    - meiraleal 3y ago
      I think that's a lazy excuse, the same as saying the food in US is worse so that's the reason for the fat epidemic, not excessive eating mixed with a widespread sedentary lifestyle