PierceJoy

10 ms·

91.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Did they fuck up though? I understand that layoffs suck, especially for those who are layed off. But I don’t think a failed business is necessarily a fuck up. Should companies not try anything new out of fear of having to lay people off if
92.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
You will lose far far more if the public loses faith in banks. Not wanting depositors to get backstopped is cutting off your nose to spite your face.
93.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> And some people critique its premise and existence. And some people critique your critique. Why do you get upset when people critique you? Why do you dismiss any feminist thought?
94.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Classic projection. Drop the short guy energy.
95.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
There's absolutely no logical connection between those two things. This is just another example of you being emotional. Please keep your replies to the other thread. You can comment on this, but do it in the other thread.
96.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> I've been acknowledging your point of view, and now you finally acknowledge my perspective, instead of continuously ignoring it. Thank you. No problem, but the point is that your perspective doesn't apply to this project. &gt
97.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
You already replied to this comment here: ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34070812 ) Now you’ve left another reply to the same comment, just more emotional this time. The reason you aren’t seeing a reply link is becaus
98.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> I'm not imposing my own definition, you're imposing a narrow definition which is fine, and I'm using a definition that is used in the colloquial sense, that even the Stanford Plato articles and other sources agree on. An
99.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Why do you reply to your own comments instead of mine? > I clearly understand you want to use “the male gaze” purely in the context of static art where the men often impose their objectification of women into paintings which are then pra
100.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> The literal act of gazing is what "the gaze" in the context of art is referring to, whether it's in media form or performed in real life. No, it is not, and this is why you're having a hard time understanding the pu
101.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> You're performing a strawman or being overly pedantic and dishonest, when my original post clearly states female gaze/attraction of men in the context of art, a TV show. That's not true. The first two sentences in your f
102.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
You started out saying that women staring at men in the gym is the female gaze. That is wrong, because the male gaze isn't about the actual act of gazing. It's about perspective. Your whole argument is centred on the act of gazing
103.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> Are you saying that this product allows us to analyse works of the past in new light? Both figuratively and literally, given that it allows you to control the lighting :) > Because, We can't create new works of the past and we
104.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> The "gaze" is essentially about a male "checking out" a woman, and a woman desiring this gaze from the male. No, that is completely incorrect. Watch the intro video again.
105.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> I do, actually, unfortunately the time has passed for those painters. The most famous piece of art is the modern world is the Mona Lisa. Historical art carries much more weight than modern art in almost all cases. Just like we continue
106.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> On the first level: there absolutely are women painters, photographers and artists, throughout history. Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun almost exclusively painted women and was a large influence on the depictions of women throughout the remain
107.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Isn’t that just a private Discord? Or do you specifically mean something you can host yourself?
108.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
It’s ubiquitous in the mountain sports community. There are some alternatives these days, but gore is still the most popular by far.
109.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
It's incredibly common to refer to the US as America.
110.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Your link doesn’t really support your claim. It was a “fine” from a private resort, that by their own account is entirely unenforceable[1]. Essentially a request for a donation to SAR. In practise, SAR is free in Canada no matter where you
111.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
You can pair the Garmin to a phone. You cannot make calls from that phone over the inreach network.
112.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> the SOS button is still fundamentally potentially a completely open-ended liability if you haven't taken Garmin's 30 buck annual insurance option for it. Not in Canada. SAR is completely free in Canada for the reason you&#x27
113.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
You might want to change North America to just America. In Canada, SAR is free no matter where you are. Clawing back costs isn't a thing here.
114.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
I’ve also had lifelong problems playing 3d games. What I noticed with VR is that if my virtual body and field of view moves with my real body, then I’m generally ok. But if my virtual field of view moves and my real head stays still, then I
115.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
You replied to a comment hopeful that this will not dissolve into a flame war with a comment directly inciting a flame war. Good job.
116.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Bundling assets, and then bundling bundles. I don’t believe that’s ever been a problem before, right?
117.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
> My prediction is that you lack the self control to stop yourself from replying, but we shall see :) :) And with that lovely validation, I am out.
118.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
There are no mistakes in my thinking or writing. You made incorrect assumptions, which are well-outlined in your writing, and then ran with them, which is funny because that’s what you accused me of. Are we going to keep going, or should we
119.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
No clarifications were needed because there was no misunderstanding. You've created a misunderstanding out of thin air, and then spent multiple replies trying to defend it. At this point it’s quite clear that you really just want to ha
120.
by PierceJoy 4y ago
Are you aware your post history is viewable? There are no mistakes in my thinking or writing. You made incorrect assumptions and then ran with them, which is funny because that's what you accused me of.

More ›