PhysicsAndYou

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   One of many typos unfortunately. Keeping track of everything explicitly its n^2. Also it really, really depends on the level of theory for the scaling of quantum regions/algorithms. To say at minimum O(n^5) is incorrect.
2. 2.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   http://www.amazon.com/Biology-Belief-Unleashing-Consciousnes... This thing? I'm not for pseudo-scientific garbage.
3. 3.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   Wow a biophysics related article on HN. I can finally be an interesting commenter! First and foremost, no one is writing off quantum mechanics. There are a lot of physical mechanisms that can't be well described by classical models: charge
4. 4.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   Technically that's the AFTAC.
5. 5.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   Thanks for doing this. Random acts of kindness may not make the world go round but it certainly makes people happy =)
6. 6.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   There's something to be said about how fantastically developed the world is relative to even a decade ago let alone 100 years or more. That said; progress isn't made by mass contentment. We must always do analysis on the margin. Even if wha
7. 7.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 16y ago

   I wish you luck in your endeavor. You're realistic but may be a little hard on yourself (I can't speak for your abilities in truth). Keep positive and possibly do OS projects as well.
8. 8.▲
   by PhysicsAndYou 17y ago

   That isn't the only problem addressed. Misinterpretation and/or abuse of statistics is prevalent in scientific literature more often then you would think. Repeatability, consensus and peer review are good ways of minimizing this problem but