Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Philpax
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
211.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
That's actually relatively understandable. The React model (not necessarily React itself) of compositional reactive one-way data binding has become dominant in UI development over the last decade because it's easy to work with and
212.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
iocraft and dioxus-tui implement the React model, or derivatives of it.
213.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
The issue is that it's missing the include paths. The compiler itself is fine.
214.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
Look at what those compilers are capable of compiling and to which targets, and compare it to what this compiler can do. Those are wonderful, and I have nothing but respect for them, but they aren't going to be compiling the Linux ke
215.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
No human developer, not even Fabrice Bellard, could reproduce this specific result in a week. A subset of it, sure, but not everything this does.
216.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
Please don't open a bridge to the Rust flamewar from the AI flamewar :-)
217.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
None - all references to 'unsafe' are in comments about the codegen: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aanthropics%2Fclaudes-c-co...
218.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
What Rust-based compiler is it plagiarising from?
219.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
Great. Did your compiler support three different architectures (four, if you include x86 in addition to x86-64) and compile and pass the test suite for all of this software? > Projects that compile and pass their test suites include Post
220.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
As you wish: https://www.axios.com/2026/02/05/anthropic-claude-opus-46-so...
221.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
I would love to see the commit log on this.
222.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
Those Rust libraries have existed for some time: - https://github.com/ratatui/ratatui - https://github.com/ccbrown/iocraft - https://crates.io/crates/dioxus-tui
223.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
Could you not have at least tried to indicate that you're about to drop two major spoilers for the game?
224.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
They're on shaky ground right now https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/02/five-...
225.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
I'm seeing it in my claude.ai model picker. Official announcement shouldn't be long now.
226.
▲
by
Philpax
8mo ago
Sufficient additional coverage + predicting the trajectory of your eyeballs. As far as I know, all of the journalists invited to try it were unable to see the low-res periphery, despite actively trying to break it with fast eye movements.
227.
▲
Steam Hardware: Launch timing and other FAQs
(store.steampowered.com)
99 points
by
Philpax
8mo ago
|
51 comments
228.
▲
Tell HN: Another round of Zendesk email spam
105 points
by
Philpax
8mo ago
|
54 comments
229.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
No, they're just a troll.
230.
▲
Claude on Mars
(anthropic.com)
28 points
by
Philpax
9mo ago
|
4 comments
231.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
See this episode of Oxide and Friends, where they discuss just that: https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/engineering...
232.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
From the essay - not presented in agreement (I'm still undecided), but Dario's opinion is probably the most relevant here: > My co-founders at Anthropic and I were among the first to document and track the “scaling laws” of AI
233.
▲
Zulip AI use policy and guidelines
(zulip.readthedocs.io)
2 points
by
Philpax
9mo ago
|
0 comments
234.
▲
Get Good at Agents
(interconnects.ai)
1 points
by
Philpax
9mo ago
|
0 comments
235.
▲
The Path to Real-Time Worlds and Why It Matters
(over.world)
3 points
by
Philpax
9mo ago
|
0 comments
236.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
What? What does the behaviour of one random open-source contributor submitting to a downstream fork have to do with the Wine team? Their post describing their troubles is all procedural, nothing social: https://old.reddit.com
237.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/why-fears-ai-is-still-the-b...
238.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
There's nothing stopping you from using OpenCode with any other provider, including Anthropic: you just can't get the subsidised pricing while doing so. This is irritating, yes - it certainly disincentivises me from trying out O
239.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
It sounds like you're using LLMs directly, instead of a coding agent. Agents are capable of testing their own code and using that to fix issues, which is what makes them so powerful. Using Claude Code, I was able to successfully produc
240.
▲
by
Philpax
9mo ago
That's not inaccurate. You can still use all of those providers: you just need to pay API costs, instead of reusing your subscription.
More ›