PeterisP

74 ms·

961.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Proving this is a very high bar to meet for performance reviews. Most formal performance reviews will be on a carefully worded standard form where literally nothing the manager selects can be libel, and even for informal references, most
962.
by PeterisP 4y ago
On the other hand, technical capabilities are highly likely to be used against elites and former elites; there often are situations where a country's police or intelligence communities are opposed to some political parties, so if there
963.
by PeterisP 4y ago
I don't think that this is a "well known term of art" - IMHO in all the articles of last year and earlier (so before the trademark application and chatGPT proliferation) when I've seen "GPT" used it was always
964.
by PeterisP 4y ago
IMHO there is no "punishment" for dissenting views. If you post something that gets downvoted into oblivion, well, the only outcome is that the community refuses to engage with that post (which we should be free to choose) but it&
965.
by PeterisP 4y ago
They applied for GPT-3 back at december 2020; however, the trademark application for "GPT" (without the numbers) is a relatively new one, from december 2022.
966.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Nominative reference to OpenAI's GPT would not be restricted, however, if you'd want to assert that the thing you made in your experiment is GPT or GPT-like, that might be iffy.
967.
by PeterisP 4y ago
I get a feeling that this wasn't planned, that this "just happened" after the release of ChatGPT and by that time it was obvious that "GPT" was the brand people were talking about and you can't simply turn the
968.
by PeterisP 4y ago
It's not copyright, it's trademark. It doesn't affect the ability of others to build GPT-like models, but it would prohibit others from calling whatever they build 'somethingGPT' or 'GPT-5'. And if someone
969.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Not really, trademarks are industry-specific, and having a registered trademark in another industry where there is no reasonable confusion is not an obstacle. For example, "Oracle" is a valid registered trademark for cigars and fo
970.
by PeterisP 4y ago
That makes some sense for PCs connected to some kind of landline, but IMHO if you have the source IP of a mobile device running Snapchat, in most setups you'd only be able to determine their cell phone network provider, the IP address
971.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Okay, things like 'museum curator' or 'charity foundation board member' come to mind, all kinds of positions that are high status but often don't even involve any serious pay and thus are generally taken by independ
972.
by PeterisP 4y ago
There's really no such thing as upper-class jobs; upper class is pretty much defined by not needing a job - the capitalists, landlords, CEO, investors and "heirs"; unlike the upper end of middle class which consists of profe
973.
by PeterisP 4y ago
If consumers spend more money, then economies of scale increase, which makes it more attractive for companies to increase supply with extra capital investment in automation instead of more labor.
974.
by PeterisP 4y ago
One thing we've seen for transcriptions in medical field (which may also be relevant in legal and others) is a need for a qualified specialist (i.e. the doctor who dictated the thing or did the patient interview) to review and sign-off
975.
by PeterisP 4y ago
The licensing costs you list are tiny and irrelevant as a revenue stream, and seem just like something in the ballpark to cover the overhead (legal, etc) of that licensing and distribution. For a manufacturer making a million devices, a lit
976.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Saltwater corrodes all the metal parts, and you simply can't use it for a steam cycle as the salt would pile up as the water turns to steam.
977.
by PeterisP 4y ago
> You need a consent popup to embed YouTube or Twitter Not really, since embedding YouTube and Twitter should work even if the consent for tracking is refused (under GDPR consent inherently is opt-in, not opt-out; and consent is valid on
978.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Can you resell a game you've 'bought' on steam to someone else?
979.
by PeterisP 4y ago
I think it's important to make a distinction between the restrictions imposed by law and restrictions imposed by the seller. For pretty much every thing there are restrictions on what you can do with it - if I buy a phone, I'm pro
980.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Property law has been deep on all the various aspects of ownership for millenia, so there's a big "bundle of rights" which any specific type of ownership may or may not have. One test for "full ownership" is the con
981.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Functioning autonomously is not the level needed to free up people. If your department gets a bunch of entry-level hires or interns, that frees up people in your organization even if they make mistakes, require supervision and can't fu
982.
by PeterisP 4y ago
They can get great people but then choose to spend their effort solely on features and ignoring things like size and speed - for example, the GTA V loading time issue ( https://nee.lv/2021/02/28/How-I-cut-GTA-O
983.
by PeterisP 4y ago
But they can charge and punish you for refusing to open the safe, that's obstruction of justice even if they could drill it and drilled it.
984.
by PeterisP 4y ago
Rejection is required to ensure that for functionally required cookies (e.g. session cookies when logged in) you refuse permission to use them for any other purpose, and that you refuse permission to use any of the many non-cookie tracking
985.
by PeterisP 4y ago
They're probably treating it the same as refusing to open a safe given a valid warrant; the rights against self-incrimination do not extend to protecting the contents of your safe, drawers, private letters, etc, and also to the content
986.
by PeterisP 4y ago
It kind of did - the vast majority of the jobs done by painters were actually replaced; painting in general and painting as fine art continued on but the vast majority of painting which was done for mundane decorative purposes effectively s
987.
by PeterisP 4y ago
One example is companies who don't need strict compliance themselves, but have some customers who do. If 10% of your customers need this for compliance, then you have to test and certify that your stuff works with something like RHEL
988.
by PeterisP 4y ago
I'd assume that there are many people in the art world who have never seriously looked at AI generated imagery - especially the part of community which is more prestigious, more experienced, older and more traditional, i.e. those mos
989.
by PeterisP 4y ago
How do you tell that some key is stored solely on a particular camera? I mean, a camera manufacturer could issue a digitally signed certificate that this key should be only embedded in a particular camera, but it doesn't prove that a
990.
by PeterisP 4y ago
My argument for condemnation was not for disallowing participation but about hiding/denying the fact that they did judge that artwork to be really good. If the chess community would assert that computers are worse than humans as chess

More ›