4 ms·
I get a feeling that this wasn't planned, that this "just happened" after the release of ChatGPT and by that time it was obvious that "GPT" was the brand people
by PeterisP 4y ago
I get a feeling that this wasn't planned, that this "just happened" after the release of ChatGPT and by that time it was obvious that "GPT" was the brand people were talking about and you can't simply turn the tide.
The trademark application was from december 2022, after the release of chatGPT. If they wanted to use GPT as a brand name, they'd have filed the trademark before that, perhaps back in 2020 when the GPT-3 trademark application was submitted without trying to also trademark "GPT" as such.
- jacquesm 4y ago> I get a feeling that this wasn't planned, that this "just happened" after the release of ChatGPT and by that time it was obvious that "GPT" was the brand people were talking about and you can't simply turn the tide. That's their problem though. Trying to trademark a well known term of art that you didn't even come up with is a very bad trick.
- PeterisP 4y agoI don't think that this is a "well known term of art" - IMHO in all the articles of last year and earlier (so before the trademark application and chatGPT proliferation) when I've seen "GPT" used it was always in reference to one of the specific OpenAI models, not to something else.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]