Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
PeterisP
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
61 ms
·
781.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if they would eventually get acquihired by nVidia. Simply providing all that code and infrastructure to the community is a big boon to raise the value and sales of nVidia hardware; the classic strategy principle
782.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
I believe that some of the most valuable short-term use cases for AI/ML seem to be "feature, not a product" - this means that the incumbents making various products can unlock lots of competitive value by adding those feature
783.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
They're not "of course completely free todo this" unless they have permission or copyright transfer from every single contributor. They don't solely own full copyright to the combined product, they have been licensed the
784.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
No, in this analogy the punishment is aimed at Nike employees who after creating a shoe for kicking puppies also operated puppy-kicking-as-a-service with that shoe. The people charged are the subset of the Tornado Cash devs who ran the serv
785.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
In the second photo I rolled, the generated human had legs that ended in hands instead of feet.
786.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Lots and lots of organizations would want a strong ChatGPT-like tool which is trained on a specific (likely not open) dataset of their choosing in addition to all the large general data that grants "common sense" and language unde
787.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
This. There are so many things you notice while living in a particular house which would have been trivial to fix in planning stage, but impractical after it's built.
788.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
There are 50000 reels, and digitizing them is not nearly instant - if you just load a new roll each time you pass by the machine, you'll have digitized a tiny random fraction, without any prioritization.
789.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
An interesting thought is that the examples in your documentation don't necessarily need to be static and the same for everyone. For example, if a user is logged in, you can autofill the appropriate accounts/domains/ids/
790.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Cellebrite won't sell that thing to most police forces (they might sell the service to them, in a way where they don't get their hands on the actual exploits), so I'd assert that it is tricky for Apple to get this. This i
791.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
They buy and build unpublished exploits and hide them so that they don't get patched - that's why the key software is tricky to get even for gov't agencies, some things for breaking fully-patched recent phones Cellebrite will
792.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
It seems that the point which parent post wanted to make with "your DNA is not really yours" is that matching your DNA does not really need your DNA, as the DNA of your relatives (e.g. that aunt which opted-in to some genetic test
793.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Fixing the consequences requires that they have to be repealed not now, not a few years ago, but rather 25 years ago.
794.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Did they automatically detect that it became very popular as it had many people visiting it regularly?
795.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
The tech industry has sufficient money and influence for lobbying to push this one through. The media industry did the DMCA adjustments to copyright reasonably fast, and tech industry is even more powerful and wealthy.
796.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
I think that the proper outcome for all of this would be acknowledgement that the current copyright laws very poorly regulate this aspect, that the key parts of any such legal action are at the not-really-described edges of law because thes
797.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
It seems to make sense, but is problematic in practice - for example, for pharmaceuticals it might take half of the total patent time until you are able to sell a product based on the patent, as getting FDA approval could take something lik
798.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
> Well, I agree that encoding is compression, at least, but the rest of that statement I do disagree with! IMHO that Shannon's paper you linked is effectively the initial work for linking prediction with compression, showing how the
799.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Because in this scenario selling the water rights to someone else would bring more money than not selling and using those water rights themselves for e.g. farming rice on that land.
800.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Why would any farmer in California ever sell their land (to which the water rights are linked) for ANY single payment? Or, really, why would any landowner anywhere, getting money from rent, would give that up for ANY single payment? Of cour
801.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
The whole point that this pricing needs to achieve is that those particular places should abandon certain types of water-intensive farming.
802.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
No, because one of the traditional use-cases why patents were made is so that an inventor of a novel solution can get investment to get that invention actually implemented without risking that the investors will just steal the invention; or
803.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
IMHO the current bottleneck is driven by the partial overlap between the gaming GPU market and machine learning needs. The expensive things that are needed by both (i.e. parallel calculations) are included in all cards, but expensive things
804.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Yes, E2E means everything between two ends is securely encrypted, but there is no "their end" between participants in a Zoom call, the Zoom company isn't an "end" in this conversation. If someone like them between t
805.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
There's no need to perish on that hill or confront anyone, a report to the local data protection agency should suffice to get it investigated and corrected, although it may take quite some time.
806.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
It might not be 100% coercive, however, at least in the EU the general legal principle seems to be that by default it should be assumed that it is coercive, due to the inherent power imbalance in employment contracts. E.g. PriceWaterhouseCo
807.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
> GDPR does have some carveouts for workplaces Can you point me to any? IMHO it does not have any explicit clauses mentioning more lax conditions for consent in case of employment relationships, and there have been multiple cases of GDP
808.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
And it's worth noting that this "expectation of privacy" depends on the jurisdiction, and in EU there have been numerous legal tests asserting that employees do have an expectation of privacy even when e.g. checking persona
809.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
At least in EU that clause is not binding, if you sign the handbook (or a contract) agreeing to it, that doesn't give the employer permission to do it - there are multiple precedents with GDPR fines for employee monitoring despite doin
810.
▲
by
PeterisP
3y ago
Sure, but the contents of what that proposed agreement can be - and are - limited by law. You can't offer a salary below minimum wage even if both parties agree. You can't have people work hours above a certain limit even if both
More ›