Permit

8 ms·

91.
by Permit 3y ago
> Well I'm kinda glad I missed this whole news cycle What negative effects would you have suffered if you had not missed this news cycle?
92.
by Permit 3y ago
> sharing it with ad partners, What do you mean by this? What kind of information do advertisers get to receive?
93.
by Permit 3y ago
My understanding is that Australia created a similar law and both FB/Google came to the bargaining table. Does anyone know what’s different this time? Is the law different? Is Canada a less valuable market?
94.
by Permit 3y ago
> What if you overfit your model to the point of exact reproduction? Or anything in between that and what you consider inventive. Where is the line drawn. The line is the same as it always has been. If you as a human publish this work th
95.
by Permit 3y ago
> It's like she's trying to say "hey, we've got it bad but at least we're not as backwards as those mOsLeM countries". Nope, it’s not like that at all.
96.
by Permit 4y ago
> never be tempted to stab the goose who's laying the golden eggs Isn’t the whole point that there are no golden eggs? People don’t want to pay and people don’t want ads. Where would you get income for the authors and for the platfo
97.
by Permit 4y ago
> The point is that basically all Stable Diffusion / DALL-E / MidJourney output is some shade of this; the only new data is that contrary to prior assertions, in some cases, it goes all the way to a verbatim copy. This is absol
98.
by Permit 4y ago
> When Google was scraping lyrics off of lyric sites--lyrics being totally and clearly copyrightable--it was dinged pretty hard for that. Was google dinged for scraping the lyrics or publishing them verbatim? My understanding is that it
99.
by Permit 4y ago
> Sorry but terms of service don't give you a blanket license to re-purpose someone else's copyrighted work at your pleasure. That’s correct. It’s also not what happened here. I don’t violate your copyright when I scrape your w
100.
by Permit 4y ago
In my opinion it was covered under the GitHub terms of service and is clearly transformative. I am optimistic that the courts will find it so and we can put these debates to rest similar to how we’ve done for web scraping.
101.
by Permit 4y ago
> Artist's works are being stolen It has been fascinating to watch “copyright infringement is not theft” morph into “actually yes it’s stealing” over the last few years. It used to be incredibly rare to find copyright maximalists on
102.
by Permit 4y ago
> In making polluting goods more expensive, you open up space for competition that uses fewer pollutants to offer similar goods at lower prices. I think we’re in agreement. I’d just say that if you make a good more expensive but then imm
103.
by Permit 4y ago
> or to reduce the burden of the good purchased by lowering taxes Why would you want this? You want prices on shipped goods that emit carbon to be high so the average European will be less likely to buy them and choose cheaper (greener)
104.
by Permit 4y ago
> Perhaps it should be; everyone can be the best at something. You have to find your something. This implies there are at least 8 billion “things to be good at” which I don’t think is necessarily true. I suspect most people are not the
105.
Moderation and R/Slatestarcodex(slatestarcodex.com)
2 points by Permit 4y ago|0 comments
106.
by Permit 4y ago
It’s clearly transformative so I cannot see a good argument for why it does not apply here. Do you have one?
107.
by Permit 4y ago
Isn’t this fair use? Copyright holders don’t get to opt out of fair use, correct?
108.
by Permit 4y ago
> How people will judge this in future ? Probably quite favorably. There appears to be broad support for Ukrainians across the entire political spectrum in the western world. I can’t think of any other recent issues that have united the
109.
by Permit 4y ago
? I'm not being intentionally rude. I'm trying to understand your comment. TikTok was previously discovered to be reading your phone's clipboard on every keystroke: https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog&#
110.
by Permit 4y ago
> Results show that tree-based models remain state-of-the-art on medium-sized data (∼10K samples) even without accounting for their superior speed. Is that really "medium"? That seems very small to me. MNIST has 60,000 samples
111.
by Permit 4y ago
This is what I would have expected as well so it was surprising to hear otherwise. I thought perhaps the OP had seen leaked documents or some other form of evidence that indicated TikTok targeted people with ADHD deliberately.
112.
by Permit 4y ago
> I have ADHD. TikTok is almost certainly designed in a way to directly exploit that fact. Can you share any evidence that TikTok was designed to exploit people with ADHD? Where do you get such confidence for this claim?
113.
by Permit 4y ago
Wait what made it radical? You said that the general consensus is that the cutoff should be 12-14 weeks and Roe made it 15 weeks (or am I misunderstanding?). It would seem radical to deviate from your chosen standard to set a limit at 0 wee
114.
by Permit 4y ago
Google | Software Engineer | Mountain View / Sunnyvale | Full time We're looking for a software engineer to help work on the XLA Compiler for TPUs. Things we do: - Take machine learning models and make them run really fast, in rea
115.
by Permit 4y ago
Off the top of my head: - Lying about the debit/credit machine being broken in order to receive cash. - Being unwilling to drive to/from certain neighborhoods. - Not turning the meter on in order to take advantage of people not fr
116.
by Permit 4y ago
> Traditional taxi companies, as shitty as their service might be some places, are risking of being driven out of business. This is not the downside you think it is. So help me if I could snap my fingers and make this happen I just might
117.
by Permit 4y ago
The only thing he "outed" was his inability to read timestamps: https://twitter.com/theryanking/status/1485784882173255680 He claimed Stripe copied his blog post, but when you click the links you'll
118.
by Permit 4y ago
> I think there's at least a very reasonable case to be made that they're not age appropriate for 7 year olds What is the case? What is the bad outcome that happens to a 7 year old who watches a PG-13 movie? (Or more generally,
119.
by Permit 4y ago
> How the heck do you know what people will want, with any sort of confidence? One way is to ask them to pay you for it (pre-order) before you make it. For the original Pebble I imagine Kickstarter helped fill this role. This worked for
120.
by Permit 4y ago
> with artistic ability With artistic taste, not ability. For example the author likely couldn’t have created any of these images himself.

More ›