PatriciaR

6 ms·

1.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
Absolutely. Speaking with only the knowledge I’ve gained from working at a department that deals with blood banking for a well known university I’d say a lot of outcomes have to do with agendas. No system is perfect and you’re right- there
2.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
I don’t actually think tech is what we need to worry about. My concerns are with access and affordability.
3.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
Feel this could be a system that is 1. Not accessible to all 2. Not affordable 3. Could lead to contraindications with other techniques and systems if not implemented properly. I’m optimistic but have also worked in healthcare long enough t
4.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
Anyone else read this? While there are still a lot of questions, the overall idea of stepping away from medication and into immersive environments as less invasive solutions is incredibly beautiful. I'd be really interested to see some
5.
Unusual Strategies for Fighting Dementia(nytimes.com)
1 points by PatriciaR 8y ago|1 comments
6.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
Hm... if true, this is both great and scary. The reasons it could be good are covered in the article. I wonder if anyone else can see how dangerous this could also be. Medical research is beautiful but can often be very dark. I would hope t
7.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
"FUCK IT! WE'LL DO IT LIVE!" In all seriousness, great decision. Well done YC.
8.
by PatriciaR 8y ago
Obviously this situation is very confusing. Seems like an honest mistake. On the plus side, really love the sense of community this has created. Best of luck to those moving forward. Whether accepted or auditing this will be a huge learning