Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
PKop
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> have popularized it It's hated by everyone, why would people imitate it? You're inventing a rationale that either doesn't exist or would be stupider than the alternative. The obvious answer here it they just used an LLM
62.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> Social contracts are typically unwritten Maybe this is the case, but why is your presumption of entitlement to free labor of others the assumed social contract, the assumed "moral" position, rather than the immoral one? Why i
63.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Expectations are maybe fine maybe not, but it's funny that people can slap the word moral onto their expectation of others being obligated to do free work for them, and it's supposed to make them be the good guys here. Why do you
64.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Those might be your moral principles, but others reject this nonsense of an obligation to perpetual free labor you think you're entitled to, and don't grant you this moral high ground you assume you have.
65.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> Maybe he might have made it known to people Yes, he coined the term rather than invent the technique
66.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> in the hopes that it would convey this message to others, including other agents. When has engaging with trolls ever worked? When has "talking to an LLM" or human bot ever made it stop talking to you lol?
67.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
LLM spammers are not rationale, smart, nor do they deserve courtesy. Debate is a fine thing with people close to your interests and mindset looking for shared consensus or some such. Not for enemies. Not for someone spamming your open sourc
68.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> you will fail to convince Convince who? Reasonable people that have any sense in their brain do not have to be convinced that this behavior is annoying and a waste of time. Those that do it, are not going to be persuaded, and many are
69.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
https://machielreyneke.com/blog/vampires-longevity/#:~:text=... “Why shouldn’t our old people, namely those who have no other recourse, likewise suck the blood of a youth?”
70.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
All of these countries had massive population increase in past 100 years. It is natural especially for high density, smaller size regions to experience a reversal in growth rates of population which is the natural and desired compensation
71.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Australia has all the same problems with immigration, just much worse. [0] I've come across so many Australians online holding the same sentiments as myself. "Per capita" measures of "economy" mean more to me than n
72.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46968194
73.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
For one thing that document argues that one of the single greatest costs to citizens of immigration is somehow a benefit: increased housing costs. They talk of higher property tax collections from increased home values, this is just another
74.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Foreigners competing for jobs and housing stock and territory is bad for current citizens. Add to it the political effect of shifting the politics away from national and citizen interests and towards more support for foreigner interests, an
75.
▲
Zero Memory Widgets [pdf]
(perso.univ-lyon1.fr)
2 points
by
PKop
8mo ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
>Why not just indiscriminately jail the people who hire them and thereby create a strong incentive to come? We definitely should do this, yes.
77.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> walk with their passport so they are not sent to jail No, it's broken because we've allowed millions of foreigners to come in and raise said healthcare and housing costs. Checking that people here actually belong here else th
78.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Yes, of course I think they lied, because a trustworthy person would never consider 0-effort regurgitated LLM boilerplate as a useful contribution to an issue thread. It's that simple.
79.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> issues auto-close after 1 week of inactivity, meanwhile PRs submitted 10 years ago remains open. It's definitely a mess, but based on the massive decline in signal vs noise of public comments and issues on open source recently, th
80.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Let's just say they are pretending to be helpful, how about that? > "Peer review" no unless your "peers" are bots who regurgitate LLM slop.
81.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Where's the code and what did you build? Everything else is just platitudes
82.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
What's that got to do with burning thousands of dollars producing nothing of value, and a lot of useless code created by agents you turn loose while advocating not reviewing it? "Used LLMs" is a non-sequitur here. What did yo
83.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
> If the spec was sufficient to fully specify the program, it would be the program Very salient concept in regards to LLM's and the idea that one can encode a program one wishes to see output in natural English language input. There
84.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
It's not so much crazy as very lame and stupid and dumb. The moment has allowed people doing dumb things to somehow grab the attention of many in the industry for a few moments. There's nothing "there".
85.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
Of course this is true but seems to be one of the most underrated facts of modern society. Always it is proposed without question to expand access to things, to "democratize" them, open barriers, open borders. But this invariably
86.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
You're accusing him of having a problem with it, which his comment does not imply.
87.
▲
by
PKop
8mo ago
If you use WPF you can have the Mica backdrop underneath your WebView2 content and set the WebView2 to have transparent background color, which looks nice and a little more native, fyi. Though if you're doing more than just showing the
88.
▲
by
PKop
9mo ago
Plenty of pump and dumpers are already wealthy what's your point? He's either doing it or not, his past employment isn't dictating it one way or another. His ability to "influence" through writing is salient to the
89.
▲
by
PKop
9mo ago
Think of context switching when you yourself are programming. You can only hold some finite amount of concepts in your head at one time. If you have distractions, or try to focus on too many things at once, your ability to reason about your
90.
▲
by
PKop
9mo ago
Aside from the magic dying, which I agree with, another commenter in this thread says there could be false positives (whether from Indians or AI doesn't matter) you'd have to 1) notice by studying your bill later and 2) resolve by
More ›