PKop

6 ms·

31.
by PKop 5mo ago
Or, even if they 100% expected to be acquired before Bun touches 1.0, you could see how they might not care about this type of tech debt.
32.
by PKop 6mo ago
No I think it's made up, there is no policy, and the lawyers couldn't care less, it's just something people do to massage their own ego.
33.
by PKop 6mo ago
Exactly. There is no scenario where we should expect some random anon to be speaking for Google. When that is the case a disclaimer is warranted, not the common case of speaking for oneself. He can write it once in his profile if he'
34.
by PKop 6mo ago
Why would they be speaking on behalf of their employer? That is what would need a disclaimer not the common case. Besides, he can put it one time in his profile, not over and over again in every comment like he does. There is no expectati
35.
by PKop 6mo ago
Because it's been a massively expensive failure. They can't just will their own platform into existence just because it would be good to have, consumers have a say and they've rejected it completely.
36.
by PKop 6mo ago
I'm building an immediate mode GUI Win32 app on top of Windows.UI.Composition visuals, maybe building up a library with it along the way. Just a hobby project / experiment. I hate this problem [0] so I went down a rabbit hole tryi
37.
by PKop 6mo ago
Why would you be a useful target market for a business running these services then? Seriously, if you can't pay anything at all, of what value is catering product offerings to you? It is thus irrelevant that you aren't happy with
38.
by PKop 6mo ago
Then you mean the API, and if that's not sufficient, then you do have an issue with wanting something for nothing.
39.
by PKop 6mo ago
Name 2 things you actually do with OpenClaw. And don't swear in your response.
40.
by PKop 6mo ago
First words out of your mouth are to accuse OP of not seriously asking the question. Then you write paragraphs saying nothing much at all. You could have simply answered the question in a simple straightforward manner.
41.
by PKop 6mo ago
SpaceX coverage is much better! lol This is such nonsense. How much does a professional videographer cost? It's a rounding error given what they spend. It's just bad planning and decision-making. This is a damn mission to the moon
42.
by PKop 6mo ago
This is nonsense excuse making. Regardless of how much money you want NASA to have, are you not yourself upset that the billions they do get were not sufficient to use cameras correctly? How much money do you think it costs to do this right
43.
by PKop 6mo ago
Sort of a tautology to just assert that someone saying good things about AI is an AI enthusiast and therefore their opinion should be dismissed. He also happens to have been a kernel maintainer, his experience as he's describing it sho
44.
by PKop 6mo ago
How is this not just common sense? Why would we care more about foreigners' interests than our own? You're trying to apply a moral frame to a discussion of self interest and geopolitics. "The strong do what they can, the weak
45.
by PKop 7mo ago
How about Odin?
46.
by PKop 7mo ago
Get this AI slop out of here. It's against the guidelines and nobody wants to see it.
47.
by PKop 7mo ago
Yes, but that's also why the claim isn't true and has been criticized for years. It is so much more instinctive to simply pull the trigger even in a panic than sit there and do nothing.
48.
by PKop 7mo ago
I don't understand how decreasing the contrast between content and chrome helps you "focus" on content. The older design screenshot has better content clarity than the current design.
49.
by PKop 7mo ago
It depends on much more than that, including the author's ability to interpret, understand, and act on what he reads to improve any problems.
50.
by PKop 7mo ago
> I want news I don’t want your endless meta commentary on the news. And you expected to find this on a decentralized social media platform?
51.
by PKop 7mo ago
> then that's the correct answer. Obviously. But they don't care about that answer, they care about the design of a new system so I'm saying the interviewer is dumb for not just asking directly for the solution he wants to
52.
by PKop 7mo ago
Eh, it's a good answer and shows good instincts, but they still want to know how he would design a system if one was necessary. There's no need to be ridiculous about any of this from either perspective, which is why it should nev
53.
by PKop 7mo ago
It's crazy the original interviewer allowed it to come to this which sounds like a waste of time for everyone involved, instead of simply saying; "Very good that is a legitimate solution to the problem. Now let's pretend you
54.
by PKop 8mo ago
No it is not the same with LLMs because LLMs are a multiplier that makes the overall work less compared to without them, and that includes support burden. "Support" is a hand wavy word to dismiss the fact that it consists of writi
55.
by PKop 8mo ago
Yea what? This is exactly why they should switch to native apps. Native apps are not harder to maintain than JavaScript especially with LLM guidance on APIs and such. I don't understand why your confidence in LLM code ability means you
56.
by PKop 8mo ago
More work for whom, Claude? So what?
57.
by PKop 8mo ago
Users would benefit from native apps, hopefully you guys will give it a try. I bet Claude would be great at it too, no?
58.
by PKop 8mo ago
> Americans are told Yes or that using strength to one's advantage is necessarily bad.
59.
by PKop 8mo ago
The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must.
60.
by PKop 8mo ago
I would argue the word loyalty can encompass external pressures like that or internal affinity, ethnic tribalism and everything in between but yes, agreed.

More ›