Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Oxitendwe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Yes, well spotted, it's also the same argument you can use for literally anything else, until all you're left with is a state's right to decide on whether to enact a plastic bag tax or not.
62.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
The "material conditions" that lead to illegal immigration in the US are lax enforcement of immigration and labor laws. If we had enforced our laws from the beginning, it would not be a problem. The solution then, is to enforce th
63.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
It's really not as complicated as you make it out to be. Everyone has a right to put the interests of themselves and their group first and foremost. Given that, the "solution" to immigration is to just not bother with it when
64.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
>Economics research says low wage immigrants are a net economic benefit, so it is in the interest of its citizens Economics is not the only factor to factor into someone's interests. Everyone has things they value more than money. &
65.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
>Apart from the idea of sorting people into useful and useless being inhumane How do you think it would affect a country to suddenly have a very large amount of low-skill immigrants? How would the native citizens, the people by which the
66.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
>In my opinion, even if it may harm some natives, due to the poverty alleviating effects of immigration, we should open immigration to anyone who doesn't have a criminal record. What is the point of government if not to act in the b
67.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
What does that have to do with Trump? Who are you concerned he is going to go to war with?
68.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
I agree completely, AT&T should absolutely honor their legal obligations.
69.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
That's a separate issue though, and something I am quite strongly against. The article was about "discriminating" specifically against the poor, and unless you'd like to argue that their collusion is willfully and knowin
70.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
>an administration with actual white nationalists as advisors Citation needed. You're probably talking about Bannon - can you explain in your own words why you think this?
71.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Is this even news? If they thought there was a profit to be made by offering them upgrades, they would do it. They haven't, so you can probably assume that there is no profit in doing so. Last I checked, AT&T was not a charity and
72.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
It's not about abortion. The states where a majority of people support abortion already have it. It's not enough, however, for the states that the American left controls to have abortion - they must have it in states controlled by
73.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Why does Trump's agenda need resistance? Why do you think you might need to die for it? Be specific, what threat does he pose that is so great that you are willing to die to stop it?
74.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
What kind of insane world do we live in where we can't block ads on our own devices?
75.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Could you elaborate? I've never heard of web assembly being related to DRM before.
76.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
If Tim Berners-Lee really wanted to save the web, he wouldn't support DRM in our web standards.[1] It's absolutely disgusting as well that they would argue that "fake news" is somehow a threat to the internet, provide no
77.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
>Idris won't reduce partial functions at the type level, in order to keep type checking decidable. Totality precludes Turing-completeness. Specifically, functions that don't terminate are by definition partial, and if you can&#
78.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Haskell's type system isn't Turing-complete or even particularly sophisticated. There are extensions to its type system implemented in GHC that in theory give you unbounded computation, but a) those aren't actually Haskell an
79.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
You don't think we're at war? Think again: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/opinion/president-trumps-... Every day is a struggle for our fundamental human rights.
80.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Do you have any idea how insulting and dismissive you sound? You know nothing about the circumstances of his hiring, how can you possibly say his real and concrete experience was easier than that of some hypothetical woman?
81.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Perhaps I should have clarified: by "literally nobody" I meant "virtually nobody", as in "the number of people who believe that we should accept no immigrants whatsoever is very small and statistically negligible&qu
82.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
I don't think it's right to equate expressing unpopular opinions with murder, no matter what you believe. If he's wrong, prove it, there's no need to resort to such ad-hominem attacks.
83.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Literally no one is arguing to the contrary. The problems people have with immigration into the US typically involve the sheer scale of it, the fact that many people who come to the United States do so illegally, difficulty with integrating
84.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
It's mystifying to me that the author comes to the conclusion that the solution to this is to educate people on debugging tools and edge-case semantics. The reason the code is difficult to debug is because the "bug" is that f
85.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Well, for one I would stop banning and restricting people for expressing their opinions. Your phone company wouldn't disconnect your service for leaving nasty messages on someone's mailbox, so Twitter shouldn't ban people for
86.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
It's absolutely insane that this is apparently the expected behavior. It makes no sense whatsoever except to give people who know this an ego boost when they can successfully work around Python's unintuitive semantics while inexpe
87.
▲
I Challenge You to Debug These 7 Lines of Code Under 9 Minutes
(theodo.fr)
34 points
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
|
33 comments
88.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
The issue here is that Shopify are being judged not for their actual stances, but for who they do business with. This is different from boycotting something because of their actual positions. What if no one would rent a building to Breitbar
89.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
Umm... is it supposed to look like this? https://aww.moe/wosyo0.png I'm using Tor Browser 7.0a1-hardened (based on Mozilla Firefox 45.7.0).
90.
▲
by
Oxitendwe
10y ago
It's especially ironic because one of the other posters mentioned about how he'll only believe it (your claim that there is a cultural purge) if it actually happens to you.
More ›