OnlyOneCannolo

21 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   Some of the recordings are on the tribe's website [1]. [1] https://passamaquoddypeople.com/collection/1890-passamaquodd...
2. 182.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   Rocket Propulsion Analysis (RPA). http://www.propulsion-analysis.com/index.htm
3. 183.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   I had an experience like this learning about rhyming words in school when I was little. "Hog", "log", and "bog" all rhymed, buy we couldn't figure out (not even the teacher) why "dog" (dowg?) sou
4. 184.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   It's a two line Makefile.
5. 185.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   Ah, now I see what you mean by 'accuracy'. Each language does have its own counting rules. There's a separate PDF for each one describing the rules for that language, which is the cool part.
6. 186.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   Different tools for different use cases. Your use cases seem to prioritize language support, update frequency, and speed (what do you mean by the accuracy part?). For this, Scc and Tokei would of course be better than UCC. The (admittedly n
7. 187.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   For anyone interested in this sort of thing, there's also Unified Code Count (UCC) [1]. It has a lot of interesting design goals like being open and explicit about the counting rules, which is really useful if you want to predict thing
8. 188.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   Interesting, but it requires adding a file to your machine. I'm constantly on different machines. Being able to log in, get all my info and settings, and then log out leaving the machine in its original state is invaluable to me.
9. 189.▲
   by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

   Simply put: There's too much of it. Chrome is dead simple, minimal, and predictable. When I want something, I look in the one menu. Firefox, on the other hand, has multiple bars, multiple menus, sidebars, icons plus text. It's too
10. 190.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    I try switching from Chrome to Firefox at least once a year, but the UI design keeps me firmly entrenched as a Chrome user.
11. 191.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    That's not risk. That's likelihood. The article admits that the likelihood is low, but the severity could be high. Risk is a combination of severity and likelihood. The nuclear industry has an entire discipline (PRA) dedicated spe
12. 192.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    Gotcha. I thought you were dismissing the possibility that it could be anything more serious than a "faux pas" if it was in fact improper.
13. 193.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    I'm challenging the use of the phrase "faux pas" to describe actions of government representatives that could harm private entities. Whether and how it happened is irrelevant.
14. 194.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    The document you linked shows that the case is Government Entity vs Private Entity. Anything improper that the government's attorneys do would be an abuse of power.
15. 195.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    This particular tool lets you trade analysis time for accuracy (amount of false positives) depending on your choice of settings, which is pretty neat.
16. 196.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    Off-hand, I don't know how it handles higher-order functions. It analyzes LLVM IR, not the source directly, so I guess it depends on how virtual methods are represented in LLVM IR and whether those instructions are supported or ignored
17. 197.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    Although I'm technically judging in hindsight since I wasn't there, I don't think I'm being unfair in my judgement. I have experience in safety and I've seen better and worse safety reviews than this one. Although t
18. 198.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    Difficult, yes, but solved [1]. There exist sound static analyzers for C and C++. "Sound" meaning no false-negatives. [1] https://github.com/NASA-SW-VnV/ikos/blob/master/analyzer/REA...
19. 199.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 7y ago

    I don't think anyone is saying that it was malicious, but it was absolutely negligent. For people with decisional authority, organizational pressure is not an excuse. For people with responsibility, lapsed vigilance is not acceptable.
20. 200.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 8y ago

    What you're describing is consumer protection, but a company isn't a consumer. The bank responsible for their own actions.
21. 201.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 8y ago

    For the curious, this is called the "incorporation doctrine".
22. 202.▲
    by OnlyOneCannolo 8y ago

    It's pronounced closer to "coke".