Olivier26

7 ms·

1.
Building Single Page Applications on ASP.NET Core with JavaScriptServices(blogs.msdn.microsoft.com)
2 points by Olivier26 10y ago|0 comments
2.
by Olivier26 10y ago
Same here, it works even with the F18A option disabled. So I apologize to these talented developers!
3.
by Olivier26 10y ago
Apparently the TMS9918 powered the MSX too, I will watch some demoes.
4.
by Olivier26 10y ago
> TI with the Speech Synthesizer and the 32K RAM expansion is vanilla to me Agree > graphics chip with some significant new features on it, I'd agree that wouldn't count. Agree too. If the graphics chip was so powerful, it&#
5.
by Olivier26 10y ago
Well, Parsec is very far from this demo, if the window is small it's for speed. The demo is full screen, which is impressive. And Parsec is coherent with what the hardware had to offer for the 3D those years, like Elite.
6.
by Olivier26 10y ago
That's an interesting proposition. I've installed MAME but I need to hunt for the BIOS.
7.
by Olivier26 10y ago
OK for the 2017 demo, but the TMS9900 was slower than the Z80/6502 of the same time, because it was a 16-bit microprocessor with a 8-bit bus, and registers were mapped to the RAM. This demo required power, and is very far from all othe
8.
by Olivier26 10y ago
The boucing ball, and Wolf3D/Doom wasn't yet a big thing in the 1981-1984 years... And the quality of graphics and sounds, the number of colors, the speech synthesis: the TI99 was more shhhh shhhh... The real 99/4A: https:&#
9.
by Olivier26 10y ago
This is an Amiga demo, the TI-99/4A wasn't so fast.
10.
by Olivier26 11y ago
The floppy disc reader was required for CP/M (and a 80 column monitor), so the comparison is with the C128 + 1571 or with the C128D. If in 1985 the C128 had been cheaper than the 6128, I'd have bought the Commodore instead.
11.
by Olivier26 11y ago
You're right, in Europe the Amstrad was less expensive than the Commodore and hence far more popular. The CPC 6128 was probably at this time the less expensive computer to run Turbo Pascal. The Apple II has an optional Z80 card, but th
12.
by Olivier26 11y ago
Turbo Pascal was also available on CP/M (so 8080/Z80 8-bit). It was the most powerful language on Amstrad CPC 6128, the only 8-bit low cost computer to offer CP/M compatibility.
13.
by Olivier26 11y ago
I have a related question. When you have one product, which name is different from the company's name, is it better to use comapany.com or product.com?
14.
by Olivier26 11y ago
What's missing is a .Net, open, powerful CMS à la Drupal 8. It's hard to understand MS doesn't take this point seriously with its Azure strategy. Orchard CMS is interesting but has little momentum and very few developers.
15.
by Olivier26 11y ago
Any idea for the availibility of the Productivity Power Tools for Visual Studio 2015?
16.
Open Sourcing Visual Studio’s GDB/LLDB Debug Engine(blogs.msdn.com)
213 points by Olivier26 11y ago|41 comments
17.
Ask HN: CMS+eCommerce+CRM for a small ISV
1 points by Olivier26 11y ago|0 comments
18.
by Olivier26 12y ago
80-100 km a week is far too much. You loose all your vital energy. You are exhausted, not relaxed.
19.
by Olivier26 12y ago
They do with Cyanogen what they did with Xenix: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix