ObservingFuture

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ObservingFuture 3y ago

   I mean, the data modeling assumed people guessing were doing so completely at random without eliminating any options (In the section "Simulation"). If I'm looking at the right document, one question was about which city out o
2. 2.▲
   by ObservingFuture 3y ago

   I only glanced at the paper, but I wonder how much of this is explained by just random chance? It looks like they used multiple choice quizzes to determine both knowledge in science and a propensity to respond "don't know" in
3. 3.▲
   by ObservingFuture 4y ago

   Huh, I didn't know that peer review was that recent. For all of its issues, I still think there would be some value in encouraging people to find issues in papers and publicly note them instead of relying on an oral history of which pa
4. 4.▲
   by ObservingFuture 4y ago

   As research slowly migrates to independent open-access journals and conferences, I wonder if there is an opportunity to coordinate (and incentivize) the peer review process in a decentralized manner. Maybe a digital currency that's cre