O__________O

8 ms·

31.
by O__________O 4y ago
Any business that uses generative AI and injects custom prompts into their workflow that they pay to have created is doing prompt engineering.
32.
by O__________O 4y ago
That’s not how responsible disclosure works.
33.
by O__________O 4y ago
Given numerous individuals are paid to engineer prompts, appears so, regardless of how common it is as a specific role.
34.
by O__________O 4y ago
It is; commonly called URL parameter tampering and it also possible to counter it: https://www.google.com/search?q=url+parameter+(vulnerability...
35.
by O__________O 4y ago
Link to video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=83UOoFWRCug
36.
MakerDAO Legal Defense Fund Accepted(forum.makerdao.com)
1 points by O__________O 4y ago|0 comments
37.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> Coverage: The Sushi DAO Legal Defense Fund will provide coverage for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for the following parties: Core contributors and multisig participants active since the ratification of Sushi 2.0 (Sushi 2.0:
38.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> The leak appears to be essentially just weights. The copyrightability of weights is the central and perhaps only issue. You’re wrong, there’s a material and significant amount of copyrighted material related to LLaMa which is criti
39.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> can't be that complex. Point is unless the new system only references the property that’s free of any claims, there’s at the very least a valid legal basis to file a complaint and it would at that point be in the courts hands
40.
by O__________O 4y ago
Happy to be proven wrong, but the weights are meaningless without the parts written by humans. If someone refers to any parts that are protected to write a new interface to the weights it would most likely be violate the law. Using the weig
41.
by O__________O 4y ago
When it comes to litigation, the parties will and resources to engage an aggressive legal adversary is critical aspect of assessing legal dynamics in a matter. For example, even in cases for which there is no direct legal leverage, party mi
42.
by O__________O 4y ago
Understand your point, specifically that your claim is that subset of the intellectual property released by Facebook in your opinion is not protected by copyright law and that as such, it’s possible to use LLaMa given per you, none of the p
43.
by O__________O 4y ago
Regardless of the merits of copyright claims, other legal issues exist; related comments: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35259914 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35260275
44.
by O__________O 4y ago
It’s unclear if Baseten is paying for this to be hosted, though two of their employees launched this. Baseten is a serverless backend for building ML-powered applications. Possible Facebook might argue by using the software to drive traffic
45.
by O__________O 4y ago
Related thread on legal basis for non-commercial license: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35259596
46.
by O__________O 4y ago
No one has done anything, nor for that matter is it clear what current law you believe might be overturned; if someone had done something that was in violation of terms related to this matter and Facebook filed a motion, matter would be res
47.
by O__________O 4y ago
You’re clearly unwilling to assume any liability for your opinions of the matter; as such, in my opinion, you should explicitly acknowledge this, as it’s relevant to assessing the merits of your beliefs. Beyond that, in this thread and in t
48.
by O__________O 4y ago
As I am sure you’re aware, I have already addressed that matter here: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35259914 If you disagree, please provide a legal basis to support such claims based on legal code or case law via
49.
by O__________O 4y ago
Laundering stolen property is not a means of escaping the law - and the terms of service were part & parcel of the related code, models, weights, etc. If they were not included in the related downloads by a third-party, upon discovery,
50.
by O__________O 4y ago
Assuming you’re so sure of your opinion that you are willing to: post a commercial use of LLaMa; provide a public means of making payments; on the related site, provide your legal name, business name, legal address, etc.; and have no issue
51.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> Not trying to shill anything; just want to build and share cool stuff. Any commercial use of Facebook’s LLaMa remains a violation of the software’s terms of use to my understanding; not saying your use is a violation, but that as i
52.
by O__________O 4y ago
Point is the critical issue to copyright is lack of a human in creating the work. A commissioned work is done by a human, as such it’s irrelevant as a comparison.
53.
by O__________O 4y ago
Millions of people have taken photos of Mona Lisa, none are novel, all are very much protected by copyright.
54.
by O__________O 4y ago
“Commissions” involve a human.
55.
by O__________O 4y ago
As I am sure you’re aware, already posted response US Copyright’s ruling related to authorship here, so will not be repeating myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35247377 Will say that post you linked to also state
56.
by O__________O 4y ago
TLDR: Dragonfly throughput is 25X faster than Redis for both GET and SET operations. https://dragonflydb.io/blog/scaling-performance-redis-vs-dra...
57.
by O__________O 4y ago
Simply having a notification on login that the account was locked, why, and means of unlocking it — unless there was proof of abuse - to me would have been the appropriate response. Not to mention you unilaterally edited username I had to r
58.
by O__________O 4y ago
No, if you’re not aware you banned users for basically no reason, nothing else to say. Already mentioned both items before.
59.
by O__________O 4y ago
To be fair, this is a test case that OpenAI claims to my knowledge was their core test case for GPT4. If this was an outstanding industry test case of note, references would be helpful. OpenAI has also not disclosed how they were able to fi
60.
by O__________O 4y ago
Aware of the ruling, reviewed it when it was released, though it does not appears to cover any aspect related to for example layout, color select, etc — and to me targets one-shot generative art; poorly so at that. As is, landscape photogra

More ›