OGinparadise

73 ms·

661.
by OGinparadise 14y ago
Att is one of the many. At&t and others will increase prices to keep their profit so maybe that's the wrong way to look at it. The average looks to be in excess of 10%. That's pretty extraordinary. Certainly well in excess of the marke
662.
by OGinparadise 14y ago
Personally I found tablets AND laptops lagging a plain old paper notebook when it came to reviewing notes before the test. Distraction is another thing (sit on the back and watch to get an idea) but I presume that iPads can eventually be
663.
by OGinparadise 14y ago
they want content providers to pay in effect to upgrade the ISP's own internal network -- which their own customers already paid them to do, but if they double dip then it's pure profit. Customers paid for what exactly? Buffet prices are
664.
by OGinparadise 14y ago
The problem is that the web went from few images and html to 90min videos. If they upgrade their network they'd have to lower their profits and raise prices. In a few words, it's just business and they'd like Google to share the wealth. Goo
665.
by OGinparadise 14y ago
It your business model doesn't work anymore, you have to move on. That's what the music and movie industry should learn. Maybe Google will have to learn it too. Google can always ask the webmasters that lost everything after Google update
666.
by OGinparadise 14y ago
Slightly of topic but Google has brought a lot of it upon itself; for example is near impossible to use without a lot of scrolling to avoid ads. I know they're ads due to my daily work but "regular" people will probably not notice them as a