Number157

8 ms·

31.
by Number157 6y ago
Please read when I said again because you are replying to something I did not say.
32.
by Number157 6y ago
I said Nordic, not Norway. Also the EU isn't actually something you are either a member of, or not. There are many treaties and Norway is a signatory to many of them. As a result, Norway does in fact contribute to the EU.
33.
by Number157 6y ago
Who do you believe then? Let's take the first sentence from the article: > As the World Health Organization reaches its findings... Why would you believe a largely Chinese controlled organization when we KNOW that China censors nega
34.
by Number157 6y ago
The EU is though and the EU gets its money from its member states who in turn take it from its people in the form of taxation. The Nordic countries are major contributors to the EU and have high taxes.
35.
by Number157 6y ago
High taxes allow the government to keep debt low but contributes to private debt.
36.
by Number157 6y ago
Because they're paying for a platform to deliver services and the platform then tries to dictate how they run their business. It's questionable at best and should perhaps be illegal.
37.
by Number157 6y ago
Please get rid of news from Facebook. It's toxic.
38.
by Number157 6y ago
Well actually kenneth is behind everything and we can prove is because we have the sources to back it up. No of course we can't give out the sources, our journalistic integrity requires us to protect our sources. But we fact checked ev
39.
by Number157 6y ago
This is the major question that liberalism tries to solve. This is why in a liberal democracy, minority protection all the way to the individual is a top priority -- the 51% are not allowed to do anything they want.
40.
by Number157 6y ago
Except that is the case here. Parler is getting censored by attacking anyone who has any part in keeping them online, like DDoS-Guard. The message is clear: help them and we're coming for you. The result: they have a lot of trouble ge
41.
by Number157 6y ago
Some people just want to hurt others. These are just excuses to do it in a way that they can enjoy being malicious while claiming to be "good".
42.
by Number157 6y ago
Every time I open reddit there's harassment and hate speech right on the front page. It's just happening against people the reddit admins hate and "good hatred" doesn't count.
43.
by Number157 6y ago
Well the issue with IP addressed is used to de-platform them. Lots of rules are broken all the time and no one cares. Suddenly when people want to get rid of someone, rules are selectively enforced.
44.
by Number157 6y ago
Well they're terrible photos. Black and white with sharp contrast and bad angles. Whoever is displaying these likely does not want to you like what you see.
45.
by Number157 6y ago
Remember when Trump was elected and the #nevertrumpers rioted for days? Or was it even weeks? I don't recall.
46.
by Number157 6y ago
Wow. Very interesting.
47.
by Number157 6y ago
And similarly there will be communists who think Stalin was a great guy at left wing rallies. We could just get rid of the labels and conclude that lots of people have authoritarian tendencies. But the existence of some such people are bein
48.
by Number157 6y ago
> is there any evidence to this Well yes. The pattern holds true pretty much 100% of the time for most media platforms. Newspapers, reddit, etc. The second question I think was already addressed.
49.
by Number157 6y ago
Every medium wants to reach as many people as possible. So they limit the visibility of what they don't like, but they don't completely get rid of people they don't like since they would no longer reach those groups. Open bas
50.
by Number157 6y ago
Time to cancel Twitter, Facebook and Reddit then. Oh but they only incite violence against the right groups. All good then. Great system.
51.
by Number157 6y ago
I doubt it. A small number of developers and enthusiasts might use the mobile versions, but most people won't. Google and Apple are currently gatekeepers and they're apparently cooperating.
52.
by Number157 6y ago
There are plenty of calls to violence even on the front pages. But those calls to violence are always against "bad people", so it's like "good hatred".
53.
by Number157 6y ago
They seem to be comfortably in the progressive group in terms on their politics, if not always their rhetorics which sometimes seems calculated to appeal to center or right wing voters. But you can pretty much completely disregard what anyo
54.
by Number157 6y ago
If there is anyone far right on a platform, people will attempt to associate the entire platform with the far right to keep people away from it, thereby forcing the platform to kick those people off or lose business. Then the scale shifts s
55.
by Number157 6y ago
It's a great example of how the situation is portrayed, except witches don't exist. In reality, they're used to demonize anyone who isn't against witch hunts.
56.
by Number157 6y ago
Are they though? Maybe I just lack some knowledge but it seems there's a trend where these definitions are shifting so that right become far right, and sometimes even people who would have been left are suddenly being called right. Tha
57.
by Number157 6y ago
Good luck hiring anyone for a struggling company. Can't turn it around? You get punished.
58.
by Number157 6y ago
You could try lodging a report: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
59.
by Number157 6y ago
If you're in the EU, you could try reporting this as a GDPR violation. How to report: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
60.
by Number157 6y ago
Don't know about kids but I think there is some requirement that people can meaningfully say no. Seems this is a breach of such a requirement. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/

More ›