NuclearPM

3 ms·

1.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
> But then I didn't say they were? Is that a question?
2.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Tongue?
3.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Trivial? Sounds like bootlicker-talk. Top 5 billionaires ≈ bottom 40% of Americans — roughly 135 million people. (The bottom quarter of households have essentially zero or negative net worth, so most of that $2.2T sits with people in the 25
4.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
I like the idea of this, but PHP is such an ugly language.
5.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Musk, Ellison, Zuckerberg, Gates, Bezos.
6.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Agreed completely. (This reply took me 0.4 seconds to generate.)
7.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
I understand now. You used the wrong word.
8.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Real?
9.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
1984 but stupid-mode.
10.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Blackberry is a sustainable business?
11.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
This is just wrong. The US prioritizes billionaires over entrepreneurs.
12.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Because the US is likely to ally with Russia over Poland.
13.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
“ if gravity is quantum then that means that they observed an interaction between the graviton and their rubidium atom.”
14.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
The AI can write a file that has this information and then look it up. Easy.
15.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
What is a null character? That’s like saying “non-zero chance”.
16.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Yes. Yes. Yes.
17.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Almost 10 years, split between apprentice, journeyman, supervisor, project manager. It’s an amazing job when young and you can see lots of remote beautiful locations. Very high divorce rate… Moved to Nuclear which is similar in that small m
18.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Canada Same system as US. Similar operating rules. Other countries have different rules including track gauges (width). Canada’s: https://tc.canada.ca/en/rail-transportation/rules/2022-2023/... “Fun” fa
19.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Canada.
20.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
> This point of view has more to do with your information diet than it does with reality. Companies un-merge and spin out all the time, for many reasons. That’s condescending and wrong. Mergers and acquisitions are hundreds of times more
21.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Both are fine. Use “by” if you think Claude do all the work. Use “with” if you consider it a tool.
22.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
I used to be a railway signalling guy. AMA
23.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
We’ll never trust the US again, unfortunately.
24.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Starting sentences with “It's almost as though/if” is very annoying.
25.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
I don’t think the italics help at all.
26.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Which is?
27.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
You think AI will blow up the world in about a year? What?
28.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
NVR?
29.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Texas cops? The ones that stop parents from saving their children during school shootings?
30.
by NuclearPM 2mo ago
Did you intentionally write that like an AI as a joke?

More ›