NuclearPM

3 ms·

1.
by NuclearPM 6d ago
> But then I didn't say they were? Is that a question?
2.
by NuclearPM 7d ago
Tongue?
3.
by NuclearPM 8d ago
Trivial? Sounds like bootlicker-talk. Top 5 billionaires ≈ bottom 40% of Americans — roughly 135 million people. (The bottom quarter of households have essentially zero or negative net worth, so most of that $2.2T sits with people in the 25
4.
by NuclearPM 9d ago
I like the idea of this, but PHP is such an ugly language.
5.
by NuclearPM 9d ago
Musk, Ellison, Zuckerberg, Gates, Bezos.
6.
by NuclearPM 9d ago
Agreed completely. (This reply took me 0.4 seconds to generate.)
7.
by NuclearPM 10d ago
I understand now. You used the wrong word.
8.
by NuclearPM 10d ago
Real?
9.
by NuclearPM 10d ago
1984 but stupid-mode.
10.
by NuclearPM 10d ago
Blackberry is a sustainable business?
11.
by NuclearPM 10d ago
This is just wrong. The US prioritizes billionaires over entrepreneurs.
12.
by NuclearPM 10d ago
Because the US is likely to ally with Russia over Poland.
13.
by NuclearPM 18d ago
“ if gravity is quantum then that means that they observed an interaction between the graviton and their rubidium atom.”
14.
by NuclearPM 22d ago
The AI can write a file that has this information and then look it up. Easy.
15.
by NuclearPM 22d ago
What is a null character? That’s like saying “non-zero chance”.
16.
by NuclearPM 22d ago
Yes. Yes. Yes.
17.
by NuclearPM 23d ago
Almost 10 years, split between apprentice, journeyman, supervisor, project manager. It’s an amazing job when young and you can see lots of remote beautiful locations. Very high divorce rate… Moved to Nuclear which is similar in that small m
18.
by NuclearPM 23d ago
Canada Same system as US. Similar operating rules. Other countries have different rules including track gauges (width). Canada’s: https://tc.canada.ca/en/rail-transportation/rules/2022-2023/... “Fun” fa
19.
by NuclearPM 23d ago
Canada.
20.
by NuclearPM 23d ago
> This point of view has more to do with your information diet than it does with reality. Companies un-merge and spin out all the time, for many reasons. That’s condescending and wrong. Mergers and acquisitions are hundreds of times more
21.
by NuclearPM 24d ago
Both are fine. Use “by” if you think Claude do all the work. Use “with” if you consider it a tool.
22.
by NuclearPM 24d ago
I used to be a railway signalling guy. AMA
23.
by NuclearPM 25d ago
We’ll never trust the US again, unfortunately.
24.
by NuclearPM 26d ago
Starting sentences with “It's almost as though/if” is very annoying.
25.
by NuclearPM 26d ago
I don’t think the italics help at all.
26.
by NuclearPM 26d ago
Which is?
27.
by NuclearPM 26d ago
You think AI will blow up the world in about a year? What?
28.
by NuclearPM 26d ago
NVR?
29.
by NuclearPM 27d ago
Texas cops? The ones that stop parents from saving their children during school shootings?
30.
by NuclearPM 28d ago
Did you intentionally write that like an AI as a joke?

More ›