NtrllyIntrstd

6 ms·

1.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
A standard behind a paywall is a paid opinion.
2.
Brian Lunduke distances himself from Odysee in light of unprofessional conduct(youtube.com)
2 points by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago|0 comments
3.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
While I agree with most of what you said, the things you mentioned are more about type inference and good naming than static vs dynamic typing. (While you definitely shouldn't) You can, for example, write Haskell without ever naming a
4.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Ever heard of &dyn traits ? (that's a joke)
5.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
That was meant as an unrelated jab at Java/OOP (y'know because Uncle Bob). Can't name it cell as that would be too obvious ;)
6.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
I don't seem to follow you 100%. Are you referring to biology or to software? In a biological sense I can't really see how a trusted platform would work. And even then it wouldn't protect against internal malicious code? I wa
7.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Well, we need to give good ol' evolution a bit of slack here, considering that it's not intelligently designed ;)
8.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Typeclasses/traits are not duck typing. A type statically needs to implement an abstract data type (with its methods and invariants ). This is more of a categorization/composition effort.
9.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
* Sorry, of course I meant ProteinConstructionProviderFactorySingleton
10.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Considering that it's 2021, and that more static typing in mammalian cells would have prevented some... unfortunate bugs, I would say no.
11.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
I still find it unfortunate that the guy who invented JS originally wanted to make a lisp but was told to make it more like the C family. Would've been interesting to have lisp run the web. A lot of things might be different today.
12.
Wayback Machine seems to be not working(web.archive.org)
3 points by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago|3 comments
13.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
The service returns a 503 after some time. Seems to be happening since a few hours ago. Doesn't matter following a direct link or entering any website through their search bar.
14.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
But romanizing doesn't solve any of those problems (except maybe having to copy/paste, but with uncommon/foreign names you'll have to re-look at it thrice either way). You're still gonna wonder if 'Sung' i
15.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Well, if you're fine with being occasionally called/written Yay-souwn (ah the mistakes that can crop in when translating names into languages with different phonetic constraints), I have no argument against that.
16.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Now the only language missing is Varic...
17.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
Butt at what cost!!!
18.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
The author seems to be missing the point, in my opinion. While it is certainly true that often one can solve simple, seemingly innocent sub-problems within more general languages, the transitions from "I see I can solve this simple pro
19.
by NtrllyIntrstd 5y ago
I think it is more of a message than a solution