Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
NickC25
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
541.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
It's not really socialist to say that a massive corporation, that already profits in the billions, doesn't really need to have a CEO that's compensated to the tune of 10s of millions annually, and also gets a massive stock gr
542.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
But that's already a thing, and probably one of the reasons the article has so much data - C-levels ARE affected: cost reductions screw over the worker, and the C-level makes more money.
543.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
I don't know how we could through legislation mandate things like banning the US government from doing biz with companies that underpay their workers and enrich their C-Suite handsomely, but I support it. With executive pay being over
544.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
One of the worst interviews I ever had was just like that. Often times, the "gotcha" part is just dumb and nonsensical, yet gives the interviewer(s) a sense of misguided (false) superiority, and wastes everyone's time. I wou
545.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Donald Trump has a history of legal troubles and lawsuits going back decades.
546.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
>Yeah because Trump is the one who's going after his opponents using the judical system. I'm sorry, the $450 million judgement was for systemic fraud committed for decades prior to his involvement in politics. Further, the goin
547.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Seriously. This is the textbook definition of front-running, or at the very least, a blatant display of insider trading.
548.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
I'll go with that. Starting with the pentagon, who hasn't ever passed a real audit. Their budget is nearly $1 trillion. I wonder how much of that goes to kickbacks, fraud, graft, etc.
549.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
He's also against the 1st and 2nd Amendments. >Really, he just means "I'll fix the country so well, and there will be so much love, that people will be happy to keep voting us back in". No, it means exactly as Trump s
550.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
There's an easy way to address this: If a corporation "moves" oversees to avoid taxes, they aren't allowed to reap the benefits of the country whose taxes they wished to avoid. If a billionaire moves to avoid taxes, they
551.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Larson is an absolute national treasure. Some of my favorite memories of my youth were reading and re-reading some of the Larson books my uncle handed down to me - Far Side Gallery1, 2, 3 & 4 , It Came From The Far Side , and Tales
552.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
> That is because those are the lowest prices possible. Insurance companies earn tiny low single digit profit margins. Almost every dollar they collect goes out as an expense for claims. Just as a caveat to this, UnitedHealth Group post
553.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Hard to shop around as an individual who doesn't work for a large corporation. My rates are absurdly high, and I get effectively zero coverage. None of the plans I could chose from were all that different.
554.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
> Any estimates on how much this will relieve our healthcare system.. aren't diabetes and CVD the biggest burdens? I know diabetes is up there, but I was also under the impression that cancer and cancer-adjacent issues were a much
555.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Can they be? Maybe. Does the average end listener (the folks listening to your tracks) really give a damn if your lead sound or bass sound was made with a digital emulation of the ARP 2600 as opposed to the real thing (or the Korg re-issue
556.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
I figured doing so would be a tad too on-the-nose in my original post, but yes, it is a clear cut case of racketeering, if not outright fraud. Agree completely regarding lack of sufficient enforcement. Honestly we could use a serious wave
557.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
>Why is it different if they do that via a middleman? Because injecting a middleman into the situation creates a facade of plausible deniability. Obviously, such deniability is complete nonsense to anyone with eyes and a brain, but here
558.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
A few questions you should answer: 1. Who would you ideally like to sell it to? I know you said designers, but the question is - are you selling it directly to them, or to companies that employ designers or a design team? Selling it direc
559.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Time for nationalization, then. If a producer of critical infrastructure cannot make profit without cutting corners, it should be nationalized so that the need to place profit ahead of anything and everything the producer does is eliminated
560.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Is anyone even remotely surprised by this?
561.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Kids don't even play video games together in the same room any more. LAN parties were a thing in the 90s but everyone was in the same room(ish). Even when playing console games people don't game together in the same room or home
562.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the grea
563.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
And if you swim enough, you can't get fat no matter how much ice cream you eat. Ever seen the diet Phelps was on? Guy ate like crap, has over 20 gold medals to his name.
564.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Well....he's kinda right. There is a staggering amount of fraud in the world these days, and some of the more nefarious propagators of said fraud don't even bother hiding it.
565.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Except if I'm an investor, and someone tells me that they are looking for a specific role that will help the company reach financial goals, they are spending time and money trying to find that person(s) and they aren't actually lo
566.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
> Amazon should be liable for the products they sell on their market place. They should not be able to absolve themselves of all liability just because they're a "facilitator" of these marketplaces. They have the ability
567.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
neat! Always love to see music theory content here. Nice find!
568.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
No/low sugar isn't inherently better for you...just saying. Most of the time stuff that advertises that there's no or low sugar is packed with sweeteners that your body still treats as sugars...but massive food conglomerates
569.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
if you want healthier juice....buy a juicer and make it yourself. You're never going to get healthy options from a wholesaler who buys from massive brands that are not known for healthy options. Long term, making it yourself is cheap
570.
▲
by
NickC25
2y ago
Is there a statute of limitations for ethical complaints in the medical field?
More ›