Neywiny

61 ms·

541.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Not sure what methodology they're using for analysis. Maybe just total wins? But there are better methods I've discussed on here before. I'm partial and biased towards using the choices as a sorting algorithm, but you can als
542.
by Neywiny 1y ago
The RTC doesn't seem much better than a 32k Crystal that the stm could use internally. Which is odd because there are better RTCs around. Maybe it's just for having the window to the crystal. And that's fair. Artistic choice
543.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Because what's the purpose? So we can get magical AI usage points? Demeritted for not using AI?
544.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Agreed. Looking through my library, the only game remotely close is RoR1
545.
by Neywiny 1y ago
I think it'll eat 7000 connection objects, maybe threads, but they'll all be on port 80 or 443? So if you can keep the overhead of each connection down, presumably easy because you don't need it to be fast, it'll be fi
546.
by Neywiny 1y ago
This is like, it might've been a Veritasium video? There was some YouTube video that started with a test, and the rest was predicted on one outcome but myself and most of the audience had a different one. At worst just read the code no
547.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Still unsure if the lifcl-33U will make it into these products. Integrated 5gbps phy
548.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Certainly an interesting choice. Dramatically worse performance but dramatically larger only time will tell how it actually goes
549.
by Neywiny 1y ago
We need failure. Just like forest fires, we need controlled burns of dead wood
550.
by Neywiny 1y ago
We play a dangerous game with science communication. When it was just "global warming" it almost worked to scare the public into behaving but then people went "yeah but look, it's cold outside". There are still a lo
551.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Hmmm so you're ignoring the crux of my argument because it's convenient for you (h264 is comfortably small, AV1 is maybe too big, so between them might work). So anything that's related to why AV1 won't fit is pointless.
552.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Yeah so if H264 fits comfortably, AV1 is maybe too big, then being better than AV1 could mean it's possible
553.
by Neywiny 1y ago
There's mention that the decode could get a lot easier. Here's an H264 core that runs on older lattice chips and only takes 56k luts. https://www.latticesemi.com/products/designsoftwareandip/int... . Mic
554.
by Neywiny 1y ago
And on top of that a lot of streaming services don't go above 1080p on desktop, and even getting them to that point is a mess of DRM. I sometimes wonder if this is the YouTube powerhouse casting a bad shadow. As LTT says, don't tr
555.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Could help people on the hobby or lower budget FPGA side. H.264/5/etc never really made it
556.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Have you considered 1 WiFi device and 49 sub-ghz devices?
557.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Slight caveat that a lot of Ethernet PHYs > 1G don't go down to 10 Mb, my some don't go to 100 Mb, and some are only the speed they want to be (though luckily that's not very common). There exist 6-speed PHYs (10,100,1000,
558.
by Neywiny 1y ago
It seems fun to be a high frequency FPGA trader designer. All my FPGA is much lower power consumption so I don't get to play with stuff like gigs of external SRAM or the QDR stuff or whatnot
559.
by Neywiny 1y ago
I think this may be a woosh moment where they're saying the Microsoft version should be called LSW because it's for Windows. Probably sounds more obvious with a more sarcastic tone
560.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Yes
561.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Maybe I'm not privy to the minutae, but there are websites talking about insurance for software developers. Could be something. Never seen anyone talk about it though
562.
by Neywiny 1y ago
I don't see how your analogy is relevant, even though I agree with it. If you sell hammers or rent them as a hammer providing service, there's no difference except likely the duration of liability
563.
by Neywiny 1y ago
The difference, as I'm sure you know, is that stocks don't care about azure migration. They care about delusions of grandeur
564.
by Neywiny 1y ago
I've never heard of that rule (though tbh I'm not allocating > 64KB of stack when I'm in assembly) and it seems Google hasn't either. While I'm sure it makes sense, I don't think I've ever seen that be
565.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Agreeing with the others. It's you. Like my initial house example, if I make a contract with *you* to build the house, you provide me a house. If you don't, I sue you. If it's not your fault, you sue them. But that's not
566.
by Neywiny 1y ago
I'm not sure I understand why this is about agents. This feels more like contracting than SaaS. If I contract a company to build a house and it's upside down, I don't care if it was a robot that made the call, it's that
567.
by Neywiny 1y ago
That's why I always incognito. Sure, I accept your cookies. They're gone in a few hours anyway
568.
by Neywiny 1y ago
That's an incredible find and once I saw the assembly I was right along with them on the debug path. Interestingly it doesn't need to be assembly for this to work, it's just that that's where the split was. The IR coul
569.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Hmmm I've had websites not accept mine but I'm still not sure why. Maybe it's the .dev . Cheapo regex
570.
by Neywiny 1y ago
Who's out here getting service updates for their CPU?

More ›