Natsu

78 ms·

931.
by Natsu 5y ago
The crowd was complaining that a laser pointer (thought to be a gun sight) was pointed at them. Kyle's weapon has no such sight, making that impossible. There's a disputed drone video footage where some think they see Kyle raisin
932.
by Natsu 5y ago
An excluded juror said that explicitly during voire dire.
933.
by Natsu 5y ago
Title was too long to submit, had to shorten it, the current title is "Judge bans MSNBC from Kenosha courthouse after report of producer following jurors." Note that the judge said both NBC and MSNBC on stream.
934.
Judge bans NBC from Kenosha courthouse after report of producer following jurors(nytimes.com)
23 points by Natsu 5y ago|11 comments
935.
by Natsu 5y ago
I honestly disliked Squid Game a lot. The MC has serious Gary Stu vibes due to surviving despite his best efforts to fail. The plot itself feels like someone made their own version of the Liar Game manga, which does almost the same thing,
936.
by Natsu 5y ago
Yes, Ziminski shot a pistol into the air. Is charged with arson (but, oddly, not with shooting that gun) and was not called to the stand, there was a fight over that in closing arguments (both for defense, then for prosecution, then goin
937.
by Natsu 5y ago
An excellent point.
938.
by Natsu 5y ago
I know what you mean. Long ago, I got Speakeasy when they had a great reputation. At some point, they turned into Megapath, but service seemed okay... at least until I tried to cancel. I filled out their form online and went through the d
939.
by Natsu 5y ago
He lied to the cops, had an expired CCL and was seen carrying on camera. There are quite a few crimes that could have been charged based on what is known.
940.
by Natsu 5y ago
I don't think I saw that person's testimony, so I'll have to find and review it. Thank you for that. If this is correct, then I would correct my wording from re-racking to racking. You're right that it casts doubt on
941.
by Natsu 5y ago
Well, if you don't want to engage in that, don't. Don't claim to have video evidence in your back pocket and then not show it to anyone because you want to shut down other people's discussions. Don't seize on part
942.
by Natsu 5y ago
> Isn't it illegal for 17 year olds to carry assault rifles and point them at others (prior to the incident where life wasn't threatened) as admitted in court. That charge was dropped because Kyle was not carrying a short-barre
943.
by Natsu 5y ago
It's funny because I was discussing this just the other day wishing there was a better way to address that fact pattern--a history of biased decisions--without dragging irrelevant and inflammatory stuff into the mix. Sadly, nobody in t
944.
by Natsu 5y ago
I'm basing my opinions on those statements made in open court that were subjected to cross-examination, not random social media nonsense, which is pretty much all there was a year ago when you formed this opinion. The police said the u
945.
by Natsu 5y ago
They're gesturing at the argument that was famously made in the 2016 movie Denial. In that, a Holocaust denier has filed a defamation lawsuit against a Jewish professor. Under UK law, she bears the burden of proof. When they later con
946.
by Natsu 5y ago
Yes, that was terrible. First, here's a copy of the photo of their interaction for reference which I found online. There are plenty of copies, including in the tweet referenced by Snopes below if you don't like this one: https:
947.
by Natsu 5y ago
Yeah, nobody else was trying to say that some pixels in a greatly enlarged image meant anything until now. And no witnesses are there to testify to this gun being raised--small wonder, given that Zimminski is the one who fired the first s
948.
by Natsu 5y ago
> But, apparently, no one cared that software presented a version with "subtracted" pixels in the first place, and only cared about pixels added by zooming in (which could have technically been "de-zooming-out", up to
949.
by Natsu 5y ago
It might not be quite the same as recycling bottles, but I worked for a cut & tempering shop where we would recycle all of our waste glass. We recycled many tons of waste glass and were paid for it.
950.
by Natsu 5y ago
The blurb says that someone claimed that someone else has control over the 64B in bitcoins in a lawsuit. Is there any reason to actually believe them behind the paywall? Because people say wacky stuff in lawsuits all the time (see also: t
951.
by Natsu 5y ago
In court, you can't just offer evidence on its own, you need to offer a witness who can attest to the evidence's reliability, who may the be cross-examined. Doing otherwise violates one's right to confront their accusers. B
952.
by Natsu 5y ago
> 20 minutes to find an expert? They'd had an expert in previously who came back and contradicted the prosecution's statement that enlarging won't add "pickles" (quickly corrected to pixels) to the image. The ju
953.
by Natsu 5y ago
I will give an app negative reviews for this practice.
954.
by Natsu 5y ago
I kinda think of them as 'orthogonal' numbers.
955.
by Natsu 5y ago
The hardest thing for me is art. Music too, but in theory you can go without that. And it's not just "ok, then find free art online" because you also have to be able to do art in code to, e.g. let players customize their cha
956.
by Natsu 5y ago
Funny, I was saying that about the problems for the rest of the decade, not just '73 and '79.
957.
by Natsu 5y ago
Are you trying to tell me here? That was no stagflation in the 70s and the only problems were in '73 and '79 and we can pretend the rest of the decade never happened?
958.
by Natsu 5y ago
> a far more obvious cause - oil price shocks The way you put it sounds rather backwards and gives me "wet streets are causing rain" vibes, as if lots of government increase of the money supply won't cause demand for scarc
959.
by Natsu 5y ago
> A user-to-user service or a search service is exempt if— [...] > the provider of the service is Parliament, or either House of Parliament, It's interesting that they exempted themselves from this, lest someone claim psychologic
960.
by Natsu 5y ago
> BT was explicitly pressured to remove "dumb" components that were thoroughly vetted after they'd started removing smart components where surveillance risk was higher. You say that as if there haven't been clever spy

More ›