Nathanba

12 ms·

121.
by Nathanba 2y ago
I don't think it's real though, it's a covert call to action via reverse psychology: "everything is really really bad, it's almost hopeless and past time so... [do something about it]"
122.
by Nathanba 2y ago
By IDE search do you mean that it was using glean even in your local vscode? Does glean therefore work in combination with LSPs, because scip says that code modifications are a non-goal and now I wonder why somebody would create such a big
123.
by Nathanba 2y ago
I guess quantum computing breaking it and them not being fast enough to adapt
124.
by Nathanba 2y ago
People aren't going to buy little usb sticks, some phones don't even have usb ports and the NFC or bluetooth connection never works properly. Also generally even having multiple devices isn't going to save you when you really
125.
by Nathanba 2y ago
All you said is that it worked for you, you even emphasize that your usecase was different because you have several devices. This doesn't relate to my question.
126.
by Nathanba 2y ago
But don't you also get into that account via your passkey? How do you know that the passkey you are using to get into the Google/Apple account isn't the same one that will be lost if you lose your phone? I've actually im
127.
by Nathanba 2y ago
I think people are just fundamentally not willing to attribute intelligence to things that can't have conversations. This is why the incredible belief was possible that babies or dogs don't feel pain. Once the AI is given some lon
128.
by Nathanba 2y ago
That's like saying that your brain doesn't understand anything, it just analyzes the visual data coming in via your eyes and predicts the next step of reality
129.
by Nathanba 2y ago
So no attacks from Trump against these tech companies in the future or your theory is wrong, I guess we will see if that works out for them.
130.
by Nathanba 2y ago
these donations will do nothing to change Trump's mind anyway, this is happening because these tech CEOs think that Trump is a vain baffoon that can be swayed by gifts and sweet words. I'm sure to some degree it's true for an
131.
by Nathanba 2y ago
You probably mean parents who went on live television to give interviews? Well obviously he can show "pictures" of people who were on TV with their name.
132.
by Nathanba 2y ago
>But is there any shred of doubt that no one, including the greediest most-souless bureaucrat, actually tried to make an airplane crash and kill people? This is not taking into account how humans are. People raise their children really b
133.
by Nathanba 2y ago
This is misrepresentation, they didn't just happen to make a mistake in a complex situation. The crime was to know about the mistake and still not fix it - on purpose. The crime was to know that they should be giving people training on
134.
by Nathanba 2y ago
I watched some of his videos at the time and to me it seemed mostly like the exact same content that he always does. Very much not brazen claims of facts, just musing and speculating that it's all fake and the parents are smiling so th
135.
by Nathanba 2y ago
it's part of being honest and citing your possibly unreliable source, you should be very glad about people who do this. The real problem is that he didn't post any actual information in his comment.
136.
by Nathanba 2y ago
The judges could give them such large fines to force them into bankrupcy. Alex Jones was fined 1.1 billion dollars. How much should Boeing be fined for causing actual deaths?
137.
by Nathanba 2y ago
Can you see the problem though: If you need a huge page dedicated to explaining the difference between how-tos and tutorials then it's clearly too confusing and not obvious at all. Nobody is going to need a page telling them the differ
138.
by Nathanba 2y ago
Your videogame example shows the problem. Tutorials are effectively just a different form of walkthrough. You are getting walked through the basics. So that's my point, you can't have different words on your website that is suppos
139.
by Nathanba 2y ago
But I want to learn something in all of those examples. I have a goal in all I do. I need technical information in all as well and I want to gain understanding in all of those as well. It really is just a bad way to name these categories. I
140.
by Nathanba 2y ago
it's the only useful definition because what else would ever be useful just for its own sake? There has to be a reference point and the moment you have one, it's technically not intrinsic anymore. So we can't do that.
141.
by Nathanba 2y ago
there is intrinsic in the context of where we are as humans , that's why saying that there is intrinsic worth is correct. Humans need to eat, intrinsically. I guess partially it depends on whether the word 'intrinsic' still
142.
by Nathanba 2y ago
I don't agree with it because while I think that it's theoretically correct, the words are too close together. To me "tutorial", "how to guide" and "explanation" are all practically synonyms. I know t
143.
by Nathanba 2y ago
yes, Intel chips aren't even that bad. Sure Intel fell back a little compared to AMD but the benchmarks are not far off at all, in fact in some Intel is ahead while consuming a bit more power. It really feels like most people make thei
144.
by Nathanba 2y ago
Yes, "associated with". But it is not part of the definition of the word. I don't know how much clearer anybody could make this. Democracy just means voting, it does not even mean that everyone gets to vote and certainly not
145.
by Nathanba 2y ago
Words have a fairly precise dictionary meaning and it's important not to constantly wage a word war where you want to win political and social arguments through word redefinitions. It's information pollution, you redefine words li
146.
by Nathanba 2y ago
All of those are just additional things ones wishes democracies to have but are not inherent in the word definition. I can certainly see that some people wish to have the definition of "democracy" expanded to mean many additional
147.
by Nathanba 2y ago
Yes I know what the word is being used these days for but it doesn't make sense. Democracy does not inherently have anything to do with these additional (also vague) terms.
148.
by Nathanba 2y ago
I think using the word "democratization" is the main issue, how does that even make sense in software? Who is doing the voting? You just "vote" by forking...? I don't get it, you also "vote" by using Micro
149.
by Nathanba 2y ago
In a way it shouldn't be tied to size either, it should be tied to results. If a social company is clearly only interested in profit to the exclusion of societal benefits then they deserve to be regulated.
150.
by Nathanba 2y ago
What even counts as social media? Is Hackernews social media? Is my future platform where people can talk to each other social media? It's all pure desperation, they could instead force social media companies to only promote useful ed

More ›