Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Nathanba
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
391.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I've never even heard of FTX and I've been in the crypto space for many years. Binance however was always near the top since it came out. There was one american exchange that used to be nr.1 but became irrelevant after they weren&
392.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
Well I agree with you on one thing, I certainly asked myself whether it even makes sense to even attempt to reason with someone who has lived his entire life with no purpose and no God and apparently no morality that would compell him to ca
393.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
No offense, but how many years have you lived in this world? Have you seen it? Have you never cared yet? If not, what is your problem? How about you actually go and when you read a piece of news or see a problem out in this world, you CARE.
394.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
imo those times where you spend a lot of time to fix something with one line of code are actually an indication that the code is pretty bad. It shows that it was hard to understand, that there was massive complexity in the system and that o
395.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
that looks really nice, very sad that Edge chooses to go another route here. They use chromium code... if Edge starts supporting AVIF I'll start using AVIF.
396.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
As simplistic as it may sound but Google probably removed it mostly because it's a chunk of c++ that they don't want around. I'm the last person to usually endorse a rewrite but in this case maybe they should consider a Rust
397.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
really a bit hard to believe that these kinds of articles aren't paid for by some industry group
398.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>What makes you think that previous management needlessly employed unproductive workers when they could have easily not done so? They probably don't know who the unproductive ones are anymore because without a fresh look at things t
399.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
This may be true in the short term but eventually more of these decisions begin to accumulate and cause more dissatisfaction. Each one on its own has barely any impact on the bottom line, it's just one more cut among a hundred cuts. In
400.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
Terrible decision in my opinion but I'm actually glad that people expose their true feelings like this. It doesn't affect me because I don't host with sourcehut but this just makes it clear who they are and what they stand fo
401.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
Trust me, the absolute last thing a valuable engineer is annoyed about is to finally have some time to show off some of the things he did.
402.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I think so too, I'm impressed that he wants to personally look at code at all. His ability to evaluate it deeply is not relevant, one thing is for sure: he can ask deeper questions than if he had no code to talk about. That alone is a
403.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>easy peasy but how do you do it? this is not as easy as it may seem. Of course it's possible but the value here is that I don't have to do this for every IDE and/or the LSP when I use webpack where waiting on the typechec
404.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>with live reload and a good configuration (that's harder to achieve on some projects, I grant you), right but livereload has the same problem as you: The build is already done so it reloads but lets say the typecheck will error out
405.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>Your assumption (from your first comment) is that people only run bundling that was never my assumption
406.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
But in theory type checks could be cached too. Why this isn't currently done is because it's probably more work and requires very deep knowledge of the typescript language and parsing. Meanwhile the bundling itself is a simple aff
407.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I recompile on every save too, all with full typechecking in under a second. As I've suspected, this is probably because most people here work in bigcorp projects where there are so many thousands of files that you cant work like this
408.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
It is you who is ranting at me with this small comment complaining about a lack of reasons while I've given many reasons now across multiple comments while you have called me a ranter with two dismissive lines.
409.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I think maybe the underlying problem here is that some people somehow manage to write javascript inside .ts files and I haven't figured out how they do that. I doubt it though, I think there is no way. It always complains about lack of
410.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I outlined some of the downsides in the comment, more in another comment of mine. I thought about it even more and I think I can finally see the possibly true reason why people are developing these type of bundlers: The typescript projects
411.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>super frustrating to do a quick experiment/demo and satisfy ts if the compiler breaks all the time tho. the ts compiler doesn't break though, I think if I understand you correctly then this might be a relict of javascript-tier
412.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>Running the typechecker independently of the bundler is really common in TypeScript maybe it is common, I can't speak to that but in my opinion a large part of the success of webpack was probably because they bundled the typechecki
413.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
>use webpack for bundling and typescript for typechecking This is my point, that's what I'm doing. Webpack does the typechecking and the bundling together, you don't get broken bundles when the typecheck didn't succee
414.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
These bundlers do not do the same work as webpack. Turbopack is using swc for typescript which means it will not do typechecking during compilation which effectively makes it fairly useless as a compiler. Now, if you only want bundling and
415.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I think you are underestimating how annoying ads are. I was in a german forum today on my mobile phone and the ads jumped into view for a second and then jumped back out again while I was scrolling. I can't imagine that anyone puts up
416.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
> https://ignitetech.com/about/leadership kind of funny how they have all these C-level executives but there is no CTO listed. And this for a supposedly technical company..
417.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
That's kind of an important thing to lie about (money and work related), I'd rather have someone not lying about anything at the very least on that subject. Actually, I'm editing the comment. Even lying about anything is bad
418.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
the exact opposite is true, Apple iPhones have never been worse than now. 1. almost every generation has some kind of hardware defect that you only find out later that lots of people report in enthusiast forums. Be it the loading cable, dis
419.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
I agree, I think in his attempt to be overly transparent he's made himself a target for these social media mobs. At the end of the day he's a businessman and if his business' financial needs require it to shut websites down t
420.
▲
by
Nathanba
4y ago
It sounds like you were in a meeting discussing how to set up a separate organization and your suggestion was to give the work to people who are doing a poor job already and then you are hoping that they'll suddenly stop failing if you
More ›