NaNDude

5 ms·

1.
by NaNDude 4y ago
i've seen you'v been recommended to learn C in another thread. in C++, the use of "references" really require to understand the concept of pointers, they'r basically the same things but not exchangeable, because ref
2.
by NaNDude 4y ago
implicitly yes.
3.
by NaNDude 4y ago
> Correct me if I'm wrong: In int main, "complex c3(c2)" creates a copy of c2 and thus passes c2 to copy constructor. it never pass c2 to the copy constructor. a) it pass a reference to it, if the copy constructor is defin
4.
by NaNDude 4y ago
the most important point to keep in mind is the default pass by value context. without defining a copy constructor, the compiler will do the copy himself, the point is : there is no copy constructor to call, so you have : 1) first the new C
5.
by NaNDude 4y ago
not a response to the question but... actually replacing an usage usually change this usage, but the effect on demand when thoses are primary ressources is'nt linked to this change. coal for exemple is a good source of synthetic fuel (
6.
by NaNDude 4y ago
may be the increases of the last forty years have'nt been studied as thoses of the 60s to 70s, but regulatory costs are still a reality, the french EPR for exemple got a 20billion increase in cost during the construction for changes in
7.
by NaNDude 5y ago
this is categorical thinking. behavioral psychology, molecular genetics, behavioral genetics, ethology, endocrinology, etc. will all provide their own "demonstrated answer" to the same question, even when they will be contradictor
8.
by NaNDude 5y ago
daniel dennett "where am i" ending novell and especially the "synchronized double conscioussness" is always interesting on this topic https://www.lehigh.edu/~mhb0/Dennett-WhereAmI.pdf
9.
by NaNDude 5y ago
yes, i must have say "have been less catastrophic than the fr one" maybe :)
10.
by NaNDude 5y ago
> this specific argument I was supporting with sources none of thoses sources is contradictory of what i explained on the history of our shortages. > Why did you chose hydro? because you talk about mix, today its fr secondary electric
11.
by NaNDude 5y ago
> The report was from 2019 because it was the first search result yes and all your sources are post 2019 (the fessenheim reactor has been slowed since 2017, the project/idea to close it started in 2012, and the effective (not revers
12.
by NaNDude 5y ago
looks like you missed the most important part of your own source : "Atomic power from France’s 58 reactors accounts for over 75 percent of its electricity needs. Available nuclear power supply was down 1.4 percentage points at 65.3% of
13.
by NaNDude 5y ago
as long as "nature", being highly polysemic, is'nt defined, yes.
14.
by NaNDude 5y ago
> It is possible that we can "naturally" evolve there is no doubt on that, we're evolving, we're even able to trace some minor genetic evolutions over the 7k last years. but the cultural myth of "natural selectio
15.
by NaNDude 5y ago
natural selection is a cultural myth (like everything talking about an undefined "nature"), may be you'r thinking about evolution theory which is driven by reproduction success, but we already bypass it, living far beyond our
16.
by NaNDude 5y ago
science fiction reference for cells eugenics: gattaca https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gattaca
17.
by NaNDude 5y ago
nuclear dispatching is mostly done over international distribution in UE. the requirements in more dispatchables power like gaz or hydro is'nt comparable with weather randomized energy sources with poor efficiency which usually require
18.
by NaNDude 10y ago
i totally suck at math, however i think i know what is a circle, i can draw one with a compas. then i think i know what is the diameter of this circle, i can draw it by drawing two more circles and a line with a ruler. because a mathematici