Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
MyDogHasFleas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
1.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
9y ago
Ivan, I bought your book "Bulletproof SSL and TLS". It's excellent, and I recommend it to those who are charged with building, deploying, or managing a real world deployment that includes TLS.
2.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
10y ago
It's more than just showing an ID. [See here]( http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/InformationbyDrugClass/u... ) item 17.
3.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
11y ago
AFAIK, SABRE is/was an airlines reservation system, not a GDS. SABRE evolved into TPF which is not related to z/OS except inasmuch as they are both operating systems that run on IBM z-series mainframes. See http://www-0
4.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
11y ago
This is a little mixed up. First trivial point you meant "virtualization" not "visualization". Second, the only thing the 360/67 had (and that was carried forward to the 370 "Advanced Function" line) was a
5.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
11y ago
The X in Xedit was for Xavier Delamberterie, who wrote it while on assignment from IBM France to IBM Endicott, where I also worked.
6.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
11y ago
No expert here, but I would guess the important bit is the "root": value, which in the example points to rootfs. rootfs, I suppose, would be the directory on the host system containing the entire root filesystem that is to be moun
7.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
I'm old enough that I've lived through these stages: 1) There were no answering machines and no cordless phones, much less mobile. If you called someone at home, and they didn't answer, you just tried later. If you called som
8.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
With SOFTWARE. It's the latest thing.
9.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Are we talking about the same thing?: https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/8859 ??? It had no etcd in it and the POC was implemented as part of the Docker API/CLI, as best I recall. There were signific
10.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Yes and Pivotal (CloudFoundry) has posted a fairly supportive blog entry on Rocket. So it's not just CoreOS "making a play". https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8683540
11.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
I attended Docker Global Hack Day #2 on Oct 30 from Austin. A talk was given on an active Docker project for host clustering and container management, which was non-pluggable, and made no reference to and used none of the code from CoreOS&
12.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
The use case for our startup is: we have lots of compute and graphics intensive services being created and tested on Macs by developers, targeted for Linux Docker instances in the cloud. It would be nice to be able to run these same contain
13.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
This is the only on-point comment so far. At some level both these apps are big time enablers of copyright infringement. Maybe you don't think that's a bad thing and all copyright laws should be gutted, or maybe you want to play l
14.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Do this thought experiment. What if Torvalds (or the equivalent) had never created the Linux kernel and put it under GPL? Where would GNU be today? And would you be thinking RMS is The Man?
15.
▲
Google Wi-Fi Roundup Has Lawyers Chasing Landmark Jackpot
(bloomberg.com)
30 points
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
|
18 comments
16.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
I would say the pedantry is on the other foot. :) Your drunk driving analogy is strained to say the least. Net neutrality has not been in effect though all of ISP history, except for a brief period before the courts shot it down. To compare
17.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Let's parse the premise. "If net neutrality fails" -- "net neutrality" -- you probably mean the currently popular version of this, which is "don't let ISPs create fast and slow lanes, and charge for the fa
18.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
There's no difference between "allow" and "not disallow"? There's a huge difference. "Allow" means to affirmatively allow ISPs to charge fees when they couldn't before, while "not disallow&q
19.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
re Internet Slowdown: I'm stuck on a dissonance between the status as presented vs. the reality as I understand it. I may well be wrong/uninformed and I'm happy to be educated if so. Here's the status as presented: "
20.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Pavlicek's article takes the form of "Docker is a lightweight VM. It is not as secure as hypervisor-based VMs. Hypervisor ecosystems can and are getting more lightweight, and so maybe they'll win the battle." Framing the
21.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
My alternative: 1. Toss receipts into a file folder per month. Time: <5 seconds per receipt. 2. At tax time, go through receipts and pull out tax related ones. Time: 30-45 minutes. Total time spent: an order of magnitude less than imag
22.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
The real question is, what is the interface you are virtualizing, and how do the characteristics of that interface influence the design of the OS you are building? Hypervisors virtualize the hardware interface: the user-mode and privileged
23.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Aw come on, all you have to do is let your users choose an icon of their favorite animal or sport, save that as an account preference, and show it to them while they enter their password. We don't need better certificate verification!
24.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
Good points, but I would argue that HTTPS provides little protection against this kind of access tracking. Even if the site is HTTPS protected, a surveillance actor on the net would still be able to read the entire site, maybe to determine
25.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
12y ago
I don't know why you're bothering with SSL at all. Your use case is that your site is informational, it's intended to be open to anyone, there is no personal/customer information on it, and there's no authentication
26.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
13y ago
Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/08... You may not include the Drudge Report http://drudgereport.com in your definition of MSM, but they have h
27.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
13y ago
Yep, you're right. I wasn't thinking about their specific business model and customer set. Thanks for setting me straight. I wonder what the Lavabit TOS and privacy terms actually said? Usually they say something like "we wi
28.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
13y ago
Where's the "I wish you hadn't done that, lavabit, I'm a customer and I feel very screwed over by this action" comments? Or is this appropriate for any SaaS vendor? You're OK with this? Should all customers,
29.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
13y ago
After reading the whole VF article I come to two conclusions. 1. If you work for a company which (as I'm sure GS does) has a policy forbidding you from uploading company data to the public cloud, don't violate that policy. Especi
30.
▲
by
MyDogHasFleas
13y ago
It'll be interesting to see what happens with this. You may be right. Depends on how enterprising Contra is, and how willing the studio is to engage in more than just selling some rights and walking away. It's not really that much
More ›