MustardTiger

13 ms·

91.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
How dare they remove the code for a "feature" that hasn't worked in several years! The horror!
92.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Not supported, "supported". Big difference.
93.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
No it doesn't. A small amount of very flawed research did. If you smile more you may become happier. But this is because other people's reactions to you change if you smile or not. People being nice to you makes you happy, not
94.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
It is a derogatory term. Just like I use the term "racist" as an implicitly derogatory term. Because it is.
95.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Seriously, read the book instead of repeating nonsense: https://realworldocaml.org/v1/en/html/functors.html
96.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>The reason you can't show me the map from F(A) to F(B) is that it's not there. That is literally the functor. Seriously, read the chapter on modules.
97.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
I can't teach you ocaml on hn. If you want to learn, try this: https://realworldocaml.org/
98.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>My point was frameworks are functionally no different than a large complex library You'll have to forgive me for not guessing that given that nothing in your post came anywhere close to even suggesting anything of the sort. I am l
99.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>However, if F is an ML functor, then there are no "maps" between the modules F(A) and F(B). Yes there is, the functor. Just repeating a false statement won't make it come true.
100.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>In OCaml and ML, Functors represent parameterized modules No, functors represent functions from a module to a module. Oh hey, that sounds just like the standard definition of a functor. As I said, the behavior is different because the
101.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>I wasn't under the impression we should be limiting this to frameworks The discussion is entirely and solely about frameworks.. >What's the difference between a framework and a library for the purpose of this discussion? Wi
102.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>Integers are not monoids. As I stated in GP, the combination (Integer, +, 0) defines a monoid This is simply being pedantic. We're all well aware of the meaning of what I said, as it is how it is almost always said. >Both of th
103.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Curl isn't a framework. >Do we really need to also be responsible to dealing with already solved problems as well as the problems specific to our domain? No? What does that have to do with anything? >Do we really want to also de
104.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
What? The statement is true in reality, it is not true in haskell. Haskell does not provide a Monoid instance for Integer, you have to use Sum or Product. >The key operation that defines a monoid is the append operation No, it is the s
105.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>So the name `mappend` is "completely wrong" in your opinion? No, it is partially wrong, as I said. Appending describes a subset of monoids, not monoids. >It's such a Haskelly response to say that I am not allowed to u
106.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>People who know Haskell can cope with much more indirection than a type alias. People can cope with all kinds of bad things, regardless of whether or not they know haskell. That is not an argument in favor of bad things. >I know you
107.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>In OCaml, “Functor” is a well-defined term with a completely different meaning No, it has the same meaning. It does not behave identically because the languages do not have identical designs. >But I would know what a “Mappable” shou
108.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
And now you would helpfully give everyone reading your code either a huge pain if they know haskell, or a completely wrong impression of what that class actually is if they don't. Great!
109.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
This whole argument is based on two false assumptions. One, that shitty broken web frameworks like cakephp and zend are "well known, well documented project with thousands of eyes fixing bugs and adding features" rather than the
110.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
> If you came upon someone's custom HTTP client, I imagine your response would be something along those lines. No, why would it? What HTTP client framework am I supposed to be wishing they used?
111.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
I wonder why this mentality only exists with web devs. Everywhere else, someone writing software is considered normal, not some scary problem. Nobody sees any other kind of application written by a previous programmer and cries "oh n
112.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
It is interesting how everyone wants to portray themselves as a victim. "I was persecuted for pursuing this very popular agenda, please ignore all the overwhelming support I got and pretend I am a victim". The idea that the Brit
113.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Yes, it works as expected. Again, what problem(s) did you have? Vague "its hard" replaced with an even more vague "it didn't work" comes off as trolling rather than a legit problem.
114.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
I'm genuinely curious here since opensmtpd has been by far the easiest to configure MTA I've ever seen. What problem(s) did you have? Virtual users through a relay host is literally one simple line: accept for domain &quot
115.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>use Postfix or Exim Better yet, opensmtpd.
116.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Yes, that's what I mean. It is called a roadwarrior VPN. As opposed to a point to point VPN.
117.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>is there a proper technical term for this type? Generally individual users connecting to a VPN are called road warriors, even if they're not on the road and always connect from the same place.
118.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
I work 12 hours apart in one day all the time. I work an average of 16 hours a week, from home. Stick to the actual discussion rather than trying to invent nonsense reasons to dismiss people's opinions.
119.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
The same CDN is serving thousands of sites, so they can track a ton of what users do. CDNs are perfectly placed to capture and sell user stats.
120.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Yes, and an even better message is the reply to it, pointing out how almost all of their issues aren't really issues: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160727002711.GI4028%...

More ›