MustardTiger

12 ms·

61.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>Everyone speaks about InnoDB and how performant and reliable it is What? Everyone speaks about how unreliable it is and how many major data corruption problems it has. >I have never heard much about storage engines in Postgres, why
62.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>Did Patitsas et al. make an error in citing their sources? An error if you are very generous. It appears to be deliberately lying about what the source says to match it to the pre-selected explanation they are pushing.
63.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
I have two questions about your challenge. How many times am I allowed to give you people that you can't teach pointers to? And how rich are you?
64.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>The earlier classes are exactly the place where things like prior experience and level of interest can possibly explain bimodality Ok? This is claiming bimodality doesn't exist, not trying to explain it.
65.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>So WAL backup is not well known or documented in my opinion What? It is the standard backup method clearly explained in the docs.
66.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Ok, but how little you value your life and how little you know about secure coding isn't useful to the rest of us.
67.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
"Being in SF" is a silly excuse. There is no reason for them to be in SF.
68.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>people who seriously know how to code mission critical X.590 root CA PKI infrastructure are not cheap And they also aren't working at letsencrypt.
69.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
No, it is absurdly high. They should be paying half that.
70.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
You are responding to a strawman. I said nothing about the trend, much less dismissed it. I addressed the reasoning I've seen people use exclusively to push for it.
71.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>This is usually about a mix of scalability, responsiveness, and partition resilience; with the level of importance of those being dependent on the application. I have never seen anyone make those arguments. I've seen people vaguel
72.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
So all those posts were just to say nothing?
73.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Yes, upon further research I see that you are correct. Thanks for the info.
74.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>I'm not sure how this supports your point Why not? What subspecies has more than 10% of the species wide variation? I can't find any. This is what I meant. Just to report facts you have to try to couch it in politically co
75.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>Yes, my complaint is that you are highjacking an article on species differentiation in giraffes to talk about purported human subspecies. I did nothing of the sort. >No, we emphatically do not have that high of a genetic difference Y
76.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html You can barely even discuss the facts much less publish them because of histrionic accusations of racism and eugenics. Also, it hasn'
77.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>People also talk about Europe and Asia as separate despite being a contiguous landmass on the same plate That analogy is not useful at all. Continents are not biological organisms. >Genetically brown and polar bears can and in reali
78.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>The long term definition was more or less 'A group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.' No, that was one long discredited idea of species. It has not been used i
79.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
Physical difference has nothing to do with the discussion. That is a complete red herring you just pulled out from no where. The empirical fact is that humans are genetically quite different. The genetic distance between human races
80.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
What you quoted supports his rebuttal, not your claim. You are completely backwards, the trend is away from that. The myth that interbreeding makes them the same species was never accurate, but it is completely unused in modern times. Fo
81.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
People have been separated far longer than just since the ice age. And no, some people think brown bears and polar bears should be reclassified, others do not. As it stands, they are separate species. Take the 2 seconds to google basic
82.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>Humans have not really had enough time as independent populations to diverge much There is no scientific basis for that claim. Many other animals have diverged less, in less time and are still separate subspecies. >African > Eura
83.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
You linked to the rhythm method, not fertility awareness. Fertility awareness means actually measuring the physiological changes resulting from the hormonal changes that precede ovulation (temperature, saliva, cervical mucous). This is mu
84.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>The CDC doesn't agree. That is because they are dishonestly presenting the data on the rhythm method and fertility awareness combined as fertility awareness. That is obviously silly, as one method is significantly more reliable th
85.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>I'm not the slightest bit interested in perfect use failure rates, because humans are rarely perfect But what other people do is of no interest or consequence to me. I know what I do, thus I am interested in perfect use rates. Wh
86.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
"Whoops!" is meaningless. And you can still have sex when pregnancy is possible, simply use an alternative entrance, or use a short term contraceptive option like a condom. According to actual studies rather than people trying to
87.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
The effectiveness is fine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_birth_control_me... You don't need to have regular periods, I am not talking about the rhythm method, I am talking about fertility awareness.
88.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
You are thinking of the rhythm method, that has nothing to do with fertility awareness, which is finding out for sure when ovulation is occurring, not guessing based on dates. Fertility awareness is more reliable than condoms, but nobody g
89.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
You are thinking of the rhythm method, that has nothing to do with fertility awareness, which is finding out for sure when ovulation is occurring, not guessing based on dates.
90.
by MustardTiger 10y ago
I don't get why people with reasonable intelligence don't just use fertility awareness. It is free, it has no side effects, and any time you decide you want to have kids you can use the same method to increase your chances. I ge

More ›