Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Muromec
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
751.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
РЗН
752.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
We know it did, it was even reported here with the usual offenders being there in the headlines
753.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
It will not of course.
754.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
But if my values allow it, thats just isolated incidents in the execution of otherwise very nicel policy
755.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
EU denies asiel requests already filled by trans people from US citing no real threat to safety.
756.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
This can't be, bribes can only happen in corrupt Eastern Europe. No way it's happening in founding EU member, they will be kicked out of the club at once
757.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Was the climate different back then? How can one thrive in the desert
758.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
EU member states have more sovereignty than US states by a big margin. There isnt even a federal tax in EU.
759.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
>Many of those countries have smaller populations and economies than American cities We can take NY (the state) and the Netherlands for example. Comparable populations (18-19 million), but GDP is 2.17 vs 1.27 trillion in favor of NY. Wha
760.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
>Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. is it? >Who exactly benefits from a business going under? Its bigger competitors? The less well off are the ones that suffer the most from oligarchic sectors and cartels. The
761.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
We already have one broke wannabe empire with nukes, can't wait to have two of them fucking around in a search of lost glory.
762.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
With the direction everything is moving, we will get back slavery faster than we will get robots and AGI.
763.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
It's not about being less rich than US, it's about US using all this money to influence politics here, because the can afford it.
764.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Your problem, not mine, lol.
765.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Labor protection costs money the same way monopolies cost money. You can have a strong cartel on the one side of the labor market or another, but there is a backed-in assumption that cartel of workers harms the economy more than a cartel of
766.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Brussels isn't even a nice city, what is this even about.
767.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Why would it become unaffordable?
768.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
There is a small problem -- more innovative society next door will get richer and eat you anyway. So lets enjoy the good times and be weak men while it lasts.
769.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
It is indeed pretty impossible to fire people who don't want to be fired. It's still possible to spin up a subsidiary and hire people into it and if doesn't work out, well, it didn't work out. Is it even the most commons
770.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Paper records are usually distributed both by agency and by locality.
771.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
You can't actually. Everything we interact with eventually ends up relying on trust, even the blockchain, but especially everything with humans and politics.
772.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
But we want to build fancy tech and not listen to those annoying humanists, so no
773.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
It will bill your 4 EUR (on a tram/bus) or the whole 20 (or something on a train) instead of the actual journey price if you forget to checkout. Pretty sure it can decline cards for insufficient balance too. Not sure the entry gate blo
774.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
in the Netherlands you can now pay with your normal credit or debit card instead of a special train card. Was a thing in Kyiv metro for a decade too.
775.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
Sounds like a callback to me
776.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
>If you have nothing then Digital IDs won't help you anyway because, if they do include address, you will also need to start by providing a proof of address to the Digital ID system! The way it works where it works -- you register w
777.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
> I think a digital id strictly improves this scenario. "Improves" does a lot of work here.
778.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
There was a "quick check", just not the one based on identity. You can always publicly disagree with the result of the id check too.
779.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
At the end of the day, somebody has to take your word for it and type it into the computer. The only questions is who has access to the records of which computer to cross-verify them. The fact that the system is not 100% consistent 100% of
780.
▲
by
Muromec
1y ago
>Second, you're on the wrong forum complaining that people need a device to do things in life. I think it's exactly right forum, because we know how unreliable and unmagical are those things and are in a good position to judge
More ›