Muromec

45 ms·

781.
by Muromec 1y ago
That entirely depends on how hostile you believe both parties of SSO exchange are towards you.
782.
by Muromec 1y ago
You don't even have to go back to Nazis. Just mention Toeslagenaffair of 2004-2019.
783.
by Muromec 1y ago
You kinda prove the point with it. Nazis killed more Jews in places with more complete and accurate population registers too. If the municipality already has a list of all the people in one table and records their faith or ethnic origin you
784.
by Muromec 1y ago
If you start with the premise that the government is hostile by default, it logically follows they will get some capability they didn't have before or increase the one they had. You will have less chance to fall through the cracks and
785.
by Muromec 1y ago
Yes it can, it devolves into otp by sms then
786.
by Muromec 1y ago
I can explain the logic behind it. The first step you need to take is view a government as a hostile entity. It's not your government, it's occupational government. It's unjust by default and you don't agree with the rul
787.
by Muromec 1y ago
An ounce is what -- 3800 USD now? That is indeed a nice suit.
788.
by Muromec 1y ago
Nobody offerred them toyota accord either. Really unfortunate
789.
by Muromec 1y ago
You are unfortunately totally right
790.
by Muromec 1y ago
That's the abuse of my tax money I can allow according to my beliefs, religious or otherwise.
791.
by Muromec 1y ago
>(Did I miss any talking points?) Silently pointing out to the whole world that does this already and nothing scary happened that can't happen otherwise. The only reason we have ids is the borders and codified inequality anyway. I c
792.
by Muromec 1y ago
> Prove that the validity of a statement (like "I am a citizen that is authorized to receive benefits") without revealing your precise identity. but... why? the agency that gives out benefits has to mint this credential and has
793.
by Muromec 1y ago
>The government cannot stop this credential from being used except by physically confiscating it or by waiting (years) for it to expire. Distributed storage in action. Not really. It's part of identity management or whatever it&#x27
794.
by Muromec 1y ago
I remember a case in a different jurisdiction where a judge dismissed a digitally signed document with an argument they aren't a party of PKI system and don't have a key, so they can't do anything. This stuff is weird.
795.
by Muromec 1y ago
That's why important stuff is done in three copies -- one to each party and the third to a notary. Here the document signing service acts as such third party and it's the rare case where they have to show up and say which copy is
796.
by Muromec 1y ago
> I don't know. Doesn't sound like a very big obstacle to me A lot of things are one law amendment away from happening and they aren’t happening. This could well become another mask mandate, which while being reasonable in itse
797.
by Muromec 1y ago
I learned a simple trick. Document all the shit, invent a metric that shows a difference between a painful shitty service-component-whatnot and a good one. The next time you are asked about feasibility of a project touching the blob of pain
798.
by Muromec 1y ago
That's a little bit out there if taken out of context. On my street the limit is 15 KM/h, on most city roads it's 30 (again, KM/h, not MPH), but on the actual highways where only cars are present and where you don&#x27
799.
by Muromec 1y ago
In residential area it is at the very least negligence on the part of authorities who set the limit
800.
by Muromec 1y ago
Can we skip to acceptance stage already?
801.
by Muromec 1y ago
>middle-class right here is the problem
802.
by Muromec 1y ago
>They want a job market where one single breadwinner can support their house, spouse and kids. Is it even possible en masse in a market where you are competing against double income no kids kind households?
803.
by Muromec 1y ago
so the job you hate and a wife that hates you? now that's how you do a boomer humor I guess.
804.
by Muromec 1y ago
>More people would benefit from getting married and having kids - a lot of (Judeo-Christian) religion’s cultural ideas were good even if its empirical claims are wrong. That's a good way to find yourself with a job you hate by the w
805.
by Muromec 1y ago
>This one really rings true. Every individual change you don’t push back on makes things slowly, incrementally worse until you end up with a pile of garbage. But do you really want to block someone’s change because they wrote some awkwar
806.
by Muromec 1y ago
More like two (and a half )
807.
by Muromec 1y ago
Or just ten very safe РБМК reactors rated 1GW each (they can't explode).
808.
by Muromec 1y ago
When 51% of the eligible voters voters cast their votes to genocide the remaining 49% percent of eligible voters (which is not what happened of course), it doesn't matter whether genocide actually happens or not to determine that it&#x
809.
by Muromec 1y ago
Fast forward 20 years, US will put tariffs on that industry for being too good to compete against.
810.
by Muromec 1y ago
What you are replying to is a not even a critique of the policy itself, so defending it is a bit misdirected on your part

More ›