Muhammad-21

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   Run manual QA test cases in a real browser with an AI agent(github.com)

   1 points by Muhammad-21 1mo ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   Show HN: Run manual QA test cases in a real browser with an AI agent(github.com)

   4 points by Muhammad-21 2mo ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   Show HN: QPilot – paste a manual test case, AI runs it in Chrome(github.com)

   1 points by Muhammad-21 3mo ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by Muhammad-21 3mo ago

   Thanks! Would love to hear how it goes — especially where it breaks.
5. 5.▲
   by Muhammad-21 3mo ago

   Healer agents solve "my test code broke, fix it". I'm aiming at manual QA teams that never had test code in the first place. For them the realistic alternative isn't nicely written Playwright, it's clicking through
6. 6.▲
   by Muhammad-21 3mo ago

   Fair point, getByRole is the right way to write Playwright tests and I worded that comparison badly. Thanks for calling it out. What I actually care about is who maintains the thing. Even a well-written getByRole test is still code that som
7. 7.▲
   Show HN: Qpilot – AI agent runs plain-text manual test cases in a real browser(github.com)

   2 points by Muhammad-21 3mo ago|5 comments