Muha_

7 ms·

1.
by Muha_ 7y ago
> You're suggesting interrupting a natural ecosystem that is beyond complex.. No.We did not understand each other. I'm talking about what we will do when we completely destroy this ecosystem. May be it will take about hundred y
2.
by Muha_ 7y ago
> Animals have spent billions of years evolving to live in and handle the world they naturally inhabit. Then what about meerkats as pets, for example? > Because animals ARE wild/ARE Nature. You can't remove nature from natur
3.
by Muha_ 7y ago
Yes, it painful for me to look at animals in narrow cages where they slowly go mad whith monotony. (next - by the Thanos voice) But in general I can't understand the logic. In the wild, the animal has hard life. It will sooner or later
4.
by Muha_ 7y ago
We have another picture here. Putin is not dictator as Hitler or Saddam Hussein. He just does what most people (not all of them smart) in Russia expect from him. We say that collapse of USSR is a catastrophe not because empire fell apart. I
5.
by Muha_ 7y ago
Film is fine. I say that someone else's view of your problems always not fair in some sense. This is the reason why the film annoys many Russians. My two uncles worked at Chernoble. One died after. The second one said us without a doub
6.
by Muha_ 7y ago
You can believe that if the Russians make a film about the segregation of blacks in America, you too will be mad and say that Americans have never been so evil and stupid (and it will be true partly).
7.
by Muha_ 7y ago
Maybe because to call wife and say "take the children and leave" is easier than to evacuate the whole city for a few hours?
8.
by Muha_ 7y ago
It's true. The totalitarianism of the USSR in 80-th is greatly exaggerated. I was born in 1974 and the first time when I heard the words "KGB" and "GULAG" was about 1989. Вefore that, I did't even realise that
9.
by Muha_ 7y ago
(with a terrible russian accent) USA can be the opened center of the free world or it can be the closed and most powerful contry in the world. If USA uses its position as the opened center of free world to become closed contry that rules th
10.
by Muha_ 7y ago
IMHO quantum mechaninc is too simple and fundamental for such complicated explanations. It only claims that probabilities of some elementary observations determined by complex number vectors wich evolve unitary.
11.
by Muha_ 7y ago
As Wheller said "It from bit". It seems to me that when physicists can to consider observation, collapse and physic phenomenas gennerally as some kind of informatinal processes, then quantumn puzzles about reality will be resolved
12.
by Muha_ 8y ago
In childhood we knew one type of paper planes ( http://korki.lol/kak-sdelat-bumazhnyiy-samoletik/ ) and it looks like it is not here.
13.
by Muha_ 8y ago
This book is not for Stalin and not against Stalin. This book is about bad people, good people and faith in fairness. And this is just a good fiction.
14.
by Muha_ 8y ago
This is a myth based on a misconception about Russians. Stalin and USSR is not same. Hitler was not a friend. Fascism terrified all Russian people. Stalin dreaded Hitler and showed friendship in order to gain time. Hitler attacked Poland an
15.
by Muha_ 8y ago
Soviet leaders had no choice. In 1920 the country was destroyed by civil war. Industry was absent. The people were starving. Society was split. Nobody has experience living without a Tsar. Nations within the country did not like each other.
16.
by Muha_ 8y ago
"Great Soviet Encyclopedia" was translated and published into English. These books contain a very detailed information about "Tuvinian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic". Finding information before Internet was diffic
17.
by Muha_ 8y ago
"I" is most valuable thing I have and only thing undoubtedly existing. And this thing not exists at all if I believe thats the world exists independently of me. This is not about natural sciences, it's a philosophical paradox