Mr_N

5 ms·

1.
by Mr_N 13y ago
Mind you, I wouldn't call a friend polite who laughs about someone behind their back, nor a friend, for that matter. I tend to trust people on face value, and I've seen that these sorts of blind studies apparently vary in their s
2.
by Mr_N 13y ago
Perhaps my mistake was working for academia (support staff, not academic) but I make a bare fraction of that. (and for comparable work to what I've done elsewhere in industry.)
3.
by Mr_N 13y ago
This does two things that I don't agree with though. One, assumes that people can accurately judge -anything- appropriately about what is safe in their surroundings. I'll trust someone so far as to not be too afraid to go outsid
4.
by Mr_N 13y ago
Sorry if I was unclear; I meant to express that I had indeed quite some time ago come to the realization, but due to placement as I said and not due to any solid proof as is cited in the article. Secondly; I'm not sure I completely see
5.
by Mr_N 13y ago
To provide a small anecdote; on my 10 minute commute to work each morning, I pass no fewer than 6 speeding cameras, potentially more that I haven't noticed, and frankly, the sheer prevalence and "sneakyness" by which they are
6.
by Mr_N 13y ago
You say that; but then you realize that a non empty set of nagios plugins monitor other monitoring systems...
7.
by Mr_N 13y ago
Who monitors the monitoring systems?
8.
by Mr_N 13y ago
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2030420/Meet-... We're well on our way. And I wouldn't expect the paranoia to not sully this advance as well.