MrOwnPut

21 ms·

211.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
If you can only preheat and toggle off remotely that couldn't happen. The preheat could just auto turn off if you don't proceed. They can also play with the oven at home too. You should teach them not to do those things. If for so
212.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> "Oh no did I leave the oven!?" Opens app.. "whoops I did, toggle off" > "Oh I'll have to cook soon" Opens app.. "start preheating to x degrees, notify when ready" > "Oh how long d
213.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
You still didn't answer the original question posed to you by the GP, so I don't know your stance or line of reasoning. And I dispute, "but don't you dare try to help", since you it's not known it helps. These
214.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> To show how it doesn't matter. It's counterproductive to talk about something that doesn't matter to you. > You know, what you think also doesn't matter. That's subjective. And it mattered enough for you to
215.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
You answered his question with another question. I believe your question is insinuating that pollution is branded as such and is really an experiment? I don't follow.. can you expand on that or clarify? But first please answer their
216.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
If all voters felt that way democracy would fall because no-one would do anything. So why comment in the first place if you think it doesn't matter? What I think is... your thought was challenged so you backpedalled then just gave up
217.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
It was a question, I re-clarified. In other words, do you think it was right for Mexico to stop this, or do you disagree with their actions?
218.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
So you support Mexico's stance then? I was asking for an opinion.
219.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
That's a cop out to the question and discussion.
220.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Okay, so we're at the next step. Do you support Mexico's decision to stop experiments on the atmosphere that may cause issues?
221.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I'm aware. But if it did cause issues it would concentrate in Mexico and dissipate globally. But what I'm asking them is.. do they believe it's in Mexico's right to ask a person to stop experimenting on the atmosphere
222.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Yes, you're missing my point to the GP, and he missed the point to the GGP. It's in Mexico's right to stop experiments on the global atmosphere from their country.
223.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I updated my post with a few questions to clarify your stance. The point of the question is to ask whether you think this has 100% chance of not causing issues. The next step of course would then be to say, okay if it isn't 100% safe t
224.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
So laws are arbitrary and if something is arbitrary it doesn't matter, so if anyone does anything that is arbitrary (in your mind) it doesn't matter? Let's back up for a second. What percentage would you say this experiment h
225.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
That's not the question. The answer to that is Mexico, the article is about Mexico judging it and "cracking down". The GP was clarifying the context. You refused to talk about the meat of their argument and instead opted to b
226.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Okay... who would judge those who want to do experiments to the global atmosphere from their country. (though as another user points out this would diffuse globally, but still be concentrated locally)
227.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Ah, yes I do agree with that.
228.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Kids are like sponges, and pretty much like training an AI. Trash in, trash out. Just because there is a bunch of trash on Netflix and elsewhere doesn't mean we should pollute the kid's world more with it. Especially at the age of
229.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
The previous sentence before your quote: > Astro now helps you organize your Markdown with built-in parsing, validation, and automatic TypeScript type generation. The bolded text leading the paragraph of your quote: > deliver complete
230.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Did you read the article? It seems like it wasn't just silence edited out. "At approximately 1:14 (a minute, 14 seconds into the audio, which can be heard here), the tone of the recording change to where to me, it sounds like some
231.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Oh, so you're disputing the reason of what the military drill is for? https://www.newsweek.com/xi-jinping-speech-suggests-china-in... It's no secret what they want to do with Taıwan and what these exercises are
232.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I believe I just did 2 comments above, before you joined in, why the hostility? Is it really so difficult to focus on the actual aggression against a sovereign country and instead squabble over exactly where they were practicing to invade
233.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
It was wording from a news outlet, but I clarified they crossed the Taıwan Strait median line. The point of my post still stands, wouldn't you agree?
234.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
The 28 aircraft crossed the Taıwan Straıt median line, knowing it's provocation. I was answering GPs question of why the news cycles. It's solely because of the aggression and the military drills around the island by Chına.
235.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
January 2nd, Chına executed their second military combat drill around the island with at least 57 aircraft, 28 flew into Taıwan's airspace. 2 H-6 nuclear-capable bombers flew south of the island during this combat drill. The last milit
236.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Inaccurate assessment. Your flagged and dead comment says others don't agree with your logic.
237.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Sure? Contact your congressman.
238.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Copying this as you said the same thing as another user: Try to do anything to another adult with consent and you'll have criminal charges. You can't ground another adult, or take away their stuff. You can with your child. Also te
239.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> What you're doing is trivialising abuse and violence by pretending physical discipline isn't. Again, what you're doing is conflating abuse and violence with discipline. > Try applying it to an adult without consent an
240.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
the player doesn't hit the ball, the bat does. when a baseball player gets slapped on the butt after a good run, would you say their teammate hit or struck them? semantic debates are fun, how'd we get here? :)

More ›