MrOwnPut

12 ms·

91.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
Interesting, I feel the same to you.
92.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
1. You can't remove all guns, you can only remove the legal ones. 2. If you had the ability to remove illegal guns from society you would have had the ability to remove the criminals in the first place. 3. Even if you did remove the mi
93.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
It's also a lot harder to defend yourself without a gun. Especially if you're physically weaker.
94.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
So everyone who is currently killing each other with guns will see their enemy gang in the street and not decide to slash them because they are too lazy? They only wanted to shoot them? It's the type of gangs in America, it's not
95.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
so you think these gangs are just going to not kill people anymore because all guns magically disappeared? you do know when they don't have access to guns in prison they then shank people with whatever they can sharpen, right?
96.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
what about a van? and there's been plenty of mass stabbings. focus on getting rid of gangs, your gun murder rate will plummet. noone seems to care about the 20-60 shootings per day in gun-free Chicago. all of those criminals don't
97.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
Could you add a hashbang for Brave search?
98.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
It's very clear what it means, it means the lifetime of how long you think this product is going to last. It's a decision as a consumer you make. When I purchased the Plex lifetime license 6 years ago, I asked myself how many year
99.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
Could you elaborate? My Plex lifetime license has been very valuable to me and has already saved me money.
100.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
Asking someone to go Google something is not a debate, it just shows your ignorance on the topic. Also throwing out random statements and saying "trust me bro, Google it" is not a valid way to debate or source your statements. If
101.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
No it means you are trying to get them to clarify their stance and explain their reasoning so you can understand them better.
102.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
I see, awesome. Thanks for the clarification!
103.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
The problem is when there is not adequate "correction" or the correction is not agreed upon, or even stated. Many times the question is ignored entirely under the assumption it is in bad faith. You may have just not convinced the
104.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
They seem to have Flutter support but the lack of React Native support is non starter for me.
105.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
No my dude, I referenced the term socratic method. Many people use the method everyday without comparing themselves to the man personally. When you use the scientific method, you aren't comparing yourself to Francis Bacon are you? Also
106.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
The same reason we bury other trash instead of incinerating it. It's better to be in the Earth than in the atmosphere.
107.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
No it's called the socratic method. You've ignored the meat of my question and now try to label it as bad faith I assume with that term. I was asking about the scale of lithium mining if it were to replace nat. gas and coal for en
108.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
I don't know these answers, that's why I'd like more people that were knowledgable to talk about the entire carbon cycle of wind turbines with actual numbers and sources.
109.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
> But anyone can listen in and tell when valid answers are being ignored. While I do agree that does happen I've also seen many people try to mind read others and assume bad faith when they were in fact asking genuine questions, and
110.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
But aren't the scales of production/output disproportionate as well? What would the impact of mining lithium be if it did need to meet the needs that oil and gas is currently serving? Comparing the effects of lithium mining vs nat
111.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
I've seen tons of articles about impacts of fossil fuel production on land. I just don't see why one mineral being pulled out of the ground seems taboo to talk about because it's potential propaganda, could it not go the othe
112.
by MrOwnPut 3y ago
So when are those issues acceptable to talk about without assuming they are propaganda? I do support alternative sources of energy, but what you've listed are serious sticking points that should be discussed and addressed, not just han
113.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> signature strikes a lasting legacy of his presidency drone strikes?
114.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> Instead, he processed a stop payment request through his credit card company However, the article doesn't say when he did the stop payment request or if it went through. If it did go through the article is wrong that he is "w
115.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
IMO the people that throw around phrases like narcissist, main character syndrome, lack of empathy, etc. usually know nothing about the person they are attempting to diagnose and simply have differing perspectives that they can't see e
116.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
It's the Reddit hive mind mentality. Doesn't start entirely organic but it ends up being nearly 100% organic hate for certain topics. Useful idiots start parroting hit campaigns and it becomes "common knowledge" for them
117.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
That's a personal question that I can't answer for you. I do, but I assume you don't. That's fine, carry on.
118.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
He's stated multiple times he bought it because of freedom of speech. Whether or not he suspected NGOs were involved in the censorship on the governments behalf is uncertain, but the goal of a global communication medium that embraced
119.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Government programs are inefficient. Also NASA is a former of it's self, funding wise.
120.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I was just asking you to clarify your morals and reasoning.

More ›