Misdicorl

7 ms·

31.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I think we'll simply agree to disagree. But suffice to say that I don't need you to explain love to me or tell me that what I feel isn't "real" love. And simply because we disagree on an adjective some people like t
32.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Its hard to imagine, and would probably break me. Something like admitted, intentional, malicious, torture of our entire family for no benefit whatsoever might do it.
33.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I agree the word is the sticking point. Unconditional to me means there is literally nothing that can change it. No conditions. If you found out the relationship was a giant ruse created by a bored billionaire and the person began behaving
34.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I don't think you're reading me properly. I think the statement is bs, not the feeling. Of course the individual matters! That's my entire point about the statement being bs. And to the other half, of course the conditions ar
35.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Perhaps that's the intent, but I don't think so. It's root is in Christianity (I think?). God loves you no matter what and all that. I think you want a different term: though I'm struggling to come up with what it might
36.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
But isn't that what "unconditional" demands of you?
37.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Unconditional love is a trope I want to die so badly. It's so.... Selfish? I read it as "You don't matter at all. I'm so big hearted and perfect; isn't it glorious?" I love my kid and wife because of who they a
38.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
You find it difficult to believe? The person clearly worked hard to achieve this aesthetic. The font even sort of matches the illustrations. This is clearly intentional from my pov. This aesthetic was more important to the author than eas
39.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Fair enough and I also agree. Got sloppy towards the end there
40.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I disagree so strongly even though I also found the font horrible. Design is used to communicate. Whether or not you want to communicate "in the clearest way possible" is a choice. There are many other choices to be made and some
41.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Point is to make the signal to noise on response too low for the scammers to deal with. Today, they can feasibly have a person look at every response and choose the most promising targets. If auto respond to even 0.01% of scam email, they s
42.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Similarly, I'd like all the scam emails to be auto responded to with fake data rather than black holed
43.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
People seem confused, but this seems very reasonable to me. Consider flying to some far away location. Would you rather A) A short flight from your local airport to a nearby hub and then transfer to a long haul flight to the far away locati
44.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I think the relevant grouping to take to task for these issues is federal, state, and local governments (and probably quite a few corporations). Not "white people".
45.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
"you can't simply draw a boundary... Https if people don't have responsibility... Only individuals do" I think this is specious reasoning. We accept this just fine in other tort circumstances e.g 1) lawsuits against a c
46.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
The solution to your quandary is to realize the division operator is massively overloaded in your expression. What you actually want is to specify s and r as true line segments and define a new operator which takes two segments and outputs
47.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
> Multiplying degrees together is not a meaningful concept. Curious what you think of the d_theta * d_phi term in a spherical coordinates integral...
48.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I think this will devolve at this point. But you should consider that you are perhaps far too confident in your position here. My last attempt is due you to consider what happens when you A) multiply two degrees together B) multiply two dBm
49.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I understand your analogy, but I reject it's validity. Degrees/radians/turns map to meters/feet/angstrom. Decibels and octaves are true "number" multipliers. You could for instance talk about degrees in oc
50.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I think I fundamentally disagree with you. Angles do not have a "base" any more than meters do (being embedded inside some metric space could be considered a base I suppose). But you seem to be drawing a distinction between meters
51.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
This is not true. Angles very much have units and it's why you can express the same concept with different numbers. Pi equals 180 degrees equals 0.5 turns. 1 radian has different units than 1 steradian and if they didn't there wou
52.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Surely the lighting matters but I think it is only secondary. The thing that's missing in reproductions is the physical texture of the paintings.
53.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
desalinization (does require transport infra, but mostly steady state)
54.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Could you solve/mitigate it with curation? Let the users be anonymous or pseudo-anonymous and keep the server signing, but add another signing field called the curator. At first blush the curation signer looks the same as the server, b
55.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Your application must feel I/O bound. But in reality it must be syscall bound in order for io_uring to make any noticeable improvement. In other words: if your application is already writing/reading at the max speed the hardware
56.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Nit: Syscall bound, not necessarily I/O bound.
57.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
I take the same approach with the extra precaution that those logins also get a separate email address (with a different pseudo-strong password). Makes it really easy to share nonsense logins with my wife/family.
58.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Another answer: > Imagine I want to fetch user data by id from Galactus, the user data service. I know what shape of data I want from it, and Galactus knows what shape of data it provides. Should both my service and Galactus have full, i
59.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
They made a coulomb bomb https://gravityandlevity.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/what-if-i-... > I worked on all sorts of problems that involved the Coulomb interaction, and occasionally my proposed solution wou
60.
by Misdicorl 3y ago
Its callous, not stupid. Consider whether those individuals best work (nobel prize granting e.g.) came before or after they started families. Consider how involved they can be with their families given how often you likely saw them around t

More ›